May 24, 2012

Self-audits now required to avoid Medicare billing errors being punished as false claims

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) have published a proposed rule to implement a provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) that requires providers and suppliers receiving funds under the Medicare program to report and return most overpayments 60 days after the date on which the overpayment was identified. Medicare Program; Reporting and Returning of Overpayments, Proposed Rule, 77 Fed. Reg. 9179-9187 (Feb. 16, 2012) (to be codified at 42 C.F.R. pt. 401, 405). The penalty for failing to return an overpayment in a timely manner is the same as the penalty for false claims—a civil penalty of not less than $5,000 and not more than $10,000 per overpayment, plus three times the amount of the overpayment.

CMS also proposes to define that an overpayment is “identified” using the same standard applicable to false claims, such as when the provider has “actual knowledge of the existence of the overpayment or acts in reckless disregard or deliberate ignorance of the overpayment.”

The preamble to the proposed rule states in relevant part that:

We believe defining "identification" in this way gives providers and suppliers an incentive to exercise reasonable diligence to determine whether an overpayment exists. Without such a definition, some providers and suppliers might avoid performing activities to determine whether an overpayment exists, such as self-audits, compliance checks, and other additional research.

Thus, under the proposed rule, any overpayments made to a provider that are discovered by a whistleblower or a government contractor instead of by routine self-auditing may subject the provider to false claims penalties.

Click here for a link to the proposed rule.

© 2012 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP

About the Author

Partner

J. Michael Grubbs is a partner in the Healthcare Department. He serves as administrator of the department for the Indianapolis, Indiana office. His practice includes representation of healthcare providers before state and federal healthcare regulatory agencies and in related litigation matters. His work also includes resolution of reimbursement and regulatory compliance issues as well as structuring or restructuring ventures and transactions to avoid problems before they arise.

317-231-7224

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.