Advertisement

May 24, 2013

Should Employees Joining a Start-up Make a “Section 83(b) Election” on Restricted Stock Awards?

A “Section 83(b) election” refers to a tax election available under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).   Generally, employees receiving restricted stock as compensation for services to a company must report income (and pay tax at ordinary income tax rates) when the stock is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture (i.e., the stock vests).  The amount included in income is the difference between the fair market value of the stock upon vesting and the purchase price paid, if any, for the stock.  Often restricted stock is granted with no purchase price so the amount taxable to the recipient is the full fair market value at ordinary income tax rates.  Once vesting occurs and tax is paid at ordinary rates, if the stock is held and continues to go up in value before it is sold by the recipient, the additional increase in value is taxed at the applicable capital gains rate provided the one-year holding period is met.

However, Section 83(b) of the Code allows employees receiving restricted stock to make an election to recognize income on the restricted stock in the year the restricted stock is awarded rather than wait until the year of vesting when the fair market value of the stock is expected to be greater.  In the year of the award, the value of the stock is often nominal and including that nominal value in income when the restricted stock is awarded is often a significant tax savings for the recipient as compared to the tax that would be due on the stock in the year of vesting without the election.

One drawback to making a Section 83(b) election is that since the stock is not vested when the election is made, the stock may be forfeited.  The consequence of forfeiting restricted stock with respect to which a Section 83(b) election was made is simply that the recipient paid tax on unrealized income and the tax paid cannot be recouped through a subsequent deduction.  Despite this drawback, in instances where the income to be reported if the election is made is small, most recipients of restricted stock make the election.

To make a Section 83(b) election, the election must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service within 30 days of the date the restricted stock is awarded.  If this time period is missed, the opportunity to make a Section 83(b) election is lost.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Our people devote themselves to serving clients--by anticipating needs and quickly responding to the unique challenges of their businesses. We've always done business this way. And we always will.

Now, more than ever, our attorneys enjoy access to myriad state-of-the-art technology tools and services that make it easy to communicate with clients. Our lawyers can create client extranets for sharing and exchanging time-critical or confidential information. They also can take their offices with them to the client workspace, or anywhere they need to be, using mobile applications...

-
414-271-6560

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.