May 24, 2012

Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR)

Both the American Hospital Association and the American Medical Association (together with numerous physician specialty organizations), have submitted letters to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) in response to a “Proposal” which MedPAC adopted yesterday, on various issues.  MedPAC Proposal freezes payments for certain primary care services and reduces reimbursement for all other “specialist services,” whether provided by a primary care physician or specialist, by 5.9 percent for three consecutive years and is thereafter frozen.  That means physicians would be looking at approximately an 18 percent cut at the end of the three year period in their compensation for many procedures they provide.

In order to maintain the level of reimbursement for certain primary care providers and cut reimbursement for any other procedures by “only” 18 percent, the MedPAC is recommending other cuts to other healthcare providers.  Such cuts could end up adversely affecting the ability of other healthcare providers to provide the assets necessary for a physician to provide the appropriate care deemed necessary by that physician for patients.

A major concern is the fact that it is now ninety days before the implementation of the 30 percent cut under the Sustainable Growth Rate provision in existing law, which would become effective January 1, 2012 if Congress does not act, and that issue has not been resolved.

© 2012 Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C. All Rights Reserved

About the Author

Shareholder

Mr. Ciesla is chair of the firm's Health Care Law Practice Area. His practice is primarily devoted to Health Care and Government Contracts Law. He counsels clients on legal developments facing healthcare providers in the modern health care environment. Firm clients include hospitals, nursing homes, physicians and physician groups, individual practice associations, home health agencies, ambulance carriers and industry-wide associations.

732-741-3900

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.