May 25, 2012

United States Patent Reform Act

On March 8, 2011, the Senate passed the America Invents Act.  The Act’s most significant change to U.S. patent law would be to implement a “first-to-file” system, which gives patent rights to the first inventor who files a patent application for an invention, even if another inventor conceived of the invention prior to the inventor that filed first.  This would create greater pressure to file an application for an invention as soon as possible.

Many think a first-to-file system would give bigger companies, such as Apple and Google, a competitive advantage over smaller companies, start ups, and entrepreneurs, because bigger companies inherently have more resources to file patents quicker and with more frequency.  Thus, if the Act becomes law, it will be critical for smaller entities, many of which drive innovation in certain technology areas, to ensure they have quick and responsive patent counsel that can file patent applications for inventions as soon as possible.

Recognizing the potential disadvantage for smaller businesses, the Act also includes several provisions that would create new advantages for smaller businesses, start ups, and entrepreneurs.  First, the Act would make it more difficult for large patent infringers to harass small business patent owners through continuous administrative challenges of a patent, or through challenges that have no likelihood of success, tactics commonly used to avoid license fees or to discourage an infringement suit.  Second, the Act would eliminate interference proceedings as the method for determining the right to a patent between competing inventors, a costly proceeding which is almost always won by larger corporations.  Third, because the Act will improve patent quality overall, it will be easier for start ups and entrepreneurs to raise capital from inventors, who would be more confident that an eventual patent would be less likely to be invalidated.  Finally, the Act will require the PTO to provide a 50 percent reduction in fees for small businesses and will create a new “micro-entity” designation for truly small and independent inventors.  This new micro-entity class will receive a 75 percent reduction in fees, which will greatly benefit start-ups and new inventors.

The America Invents Act, which passed in a bipartisan 95-5 vote in the Senate, still must make its way through the House to become law.  Although the House is expected to vote in support of a compromise bill, final passage could be blocked by a late-stage “hold” in the Senate.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Partner

John Scheller is a partner in the firm’s Litigation and Intellectual Property Litigation Practice Groups and leader of the firm’s Technology Industry Group.  In addition, Mr. Scheller has experience in litigation, licensing and counseling involving trademark, trade dress, trade secret, copyright and unfair competition. 

608-283-2276

About the Author

Matthew Brown is a member of the Intellectual Property Litigation Group in the Madison office.

608-257-3062

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.