May 25, 2012

Update: .XXX Top-Level Domain Sunrise Period Starts September 7th

As we have previously advised in our alerts and updates on the topic of “Keeping Your Trademarks From Becoming .XXX-Rated,” a new top-level domain name .XXX which has been authorized for the adult entertainment industry begins a “Sunrise” period today September 7, 2011. During the 50 day “Sunrise” period, members of the adult entertainment industry may submit registration requests for domain names with the new .XXX extension which correspond to their existing domain names and trademarks. During this period, trademark owners, authorized licensees or assignees may also apply to block their registered trademarks from registration in the .XXX top-level domain.

What are the requirements to file an application to block?

The applicant must be a trademark owner or an authorized licensee or assignee. The to-be-blocked domain name must correspond exactly to the text of a registered mark. Alterations (for example, if another term, symbol or letter is added to or deleted from a mark) or misspellings may not be blocked during the Sunrise period. Additionally, the mark must have been registered prior to September 1, 2011.

Do the participating registrars charge a fee for preemptive blocking?

Yes. The one-time fee is about $200–$400 depending on the registrar.  A list of the accredited registrars is available by clicking here.

What happens if a member of the adult entertainment industry applies to register a term in the .XXX extension, and a trademark owner submits an application to block the same term from registration?

During the Sunrise period, a Start-Up Trademark Opposition (“STOP”) procedure allows a domain-name applicant to withdraw the application if the same name is subject to blocking by another applicant. If the domain-name applicant does not withdraw the application the registration of the domain name will proceed; however, the domain-name applicant will not be able to claim lack of notice in any subsequent dispute proceeding.

What if a trademark owner does not apply to block its trademarks during the Sunrise period? Will there be other opportunities to challenge the use of the trademark as part of a .XXX domain name?

There will be opportunities to challenge violations of trademark rights even if a trademark owner does not block its trademarks from registration in the .XXX registry. The registration and use of a trademark or its variation in the .XXX registry may be challenged by means including arbitration under ICANN’s Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (“UDRP”), a Rapid Evaluation Service (“RES”), or litigation.

For many trademark owners, the decision of whether to apply to have their trademarks blocked from the .XXX registry will ultimately depend upon whether they conclude that the cost to prevent is less than the cost to cure. 

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Associate

Jin-Won Jung is a member of the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the Chicago office.  

312-596-5807

About the Author

Partner

Jeffrey Brown is a partner in the firm’s intellectual property practice group who offers extensive experience counseling clients on a wide variety of corporate and intellectual property matters. His practice includes trademark, copyright, trade secret, advertising and unfair competition issues. He assists clients in developing strategies to protect, exploit and enforce their intellectual property rights and represents them against allegations of infringement. He has substantial experience representing clients in contested proceedings before the Trademark Trial...

312-222-5794

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.