May 25, 2012

Wind Power Operators Beware: OSHA Is Focused on You

For over a year now, the Occupational Safety & Health Administration has had on the front page of its website the prominent heading which states “Green Jobs Are Good Jobs When They Are Safe Jobs.” 

While the current administration has been advancing a green agenda, it has also been aggressively looking for safety violations in order to advance a safety agenda within the renewable energy world.  In recent years, the Occupational Safety & Health Administration has been “getting tough” on safety violations, regularly issuing six figure citations and sometimes seven or eight figure citations.  So, it was only a matter of time before a renewable energy company made headlines for big OSHA fines. 

On April 19, 2011, a wind energy employer made headlines when it was issued $378,000 in penalties after a worker suffered burns from an electrical incident. 

On the day of the incident, the injured worker suffered 3rd degree burns to his neck, chest and arms and 2nd degree burns to the face, as a result of an arc flash that occurred when a transformer was unexpectedly energized by another worker. OSHA has alleged that the worker was injured as the result of a deficient lockout/tagout procedure.

Specifically, OSHA has alleged that each employee was not issued his own lock, in order to lockout electrical equipment, so as to prevent other employees from re-energizing the equipment.  OSHA has alleged that this created a hazard to employees working 350 feet above the ground, when the switch gear on the tower turbine was re-engaged at the ground level, without the knowledge of technicians working at the top of the wind turbine.

OSHA has applied its severe violator enforcement program (SVEP) to the wind farm operator.  Under this program, any settlement agreement will likely contain requirements for multiple follow-up inspections, the employment of outside safety consultants and/or the hiring of a safety professional, and the implementation of numerous other safety procedures. 

The wind farm operator is headquartered in Minnesota. The fact that the citations were issued to a wind farm in Illinois, suggests that the operator may have multiple facilities in other states. It is likely OSHA will attempt to extract a settlement agreement from this operator that requires compliance at all of its other facilities under the severe violator enforcement program. 

Wind farm operators and other renewable energy companies should be aware that OSHA is looking to make headlines by issuing large fines.  The wind energy industry should be aware of the specific standards that will be the focus of an OSHA inspection, which include standards addressing:

  • falls;
  • confined spaces;
  • fires;
  • lockout/tagout;
  • medical and first aid;
  • crane, derrick and hoist safety;
  • electrical hazards;
  • machine guarding; and
  • respiratory protection. 

Further information regarding OSHA requirements for the wind industry can be found at:https://www.osha.gov/dep/greenjobs/windenergy.html

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Partner

Chuck Palmer is Office Managing partner in Michael Best’s Waukesha Office. He also is a member of the Employment Relations Practice Group and Co-Chair of the Construction Group. He focuses his practice in labor negotiations, employment and safety related litigation, Equal Employment Opportunity law, Pipeline and Construction Safety laws, Occupational Safety and Health Administration laws and regulations, restrictive covenants, independent contractor and employment contracts, and workers compensation. 

262-956-6518

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.