Advertisement

April 20, 2014

Collateral Granted by Subsidiaries to Secure Parent's Debts is Avoided in Bankruptcy: A Cautionary Lesson for Lenders

TOUSA was a homebuilder that invested in a joint venture known as Transeastern in 2005.  Transeastern borrowed $560 million in a syndicated loan from certain lenders (“Transeastern Lenders”).  Later, Transeastern defaulted, and in an effort to settle the default, TOUSA borrowed $500 million from Citicorp.  In connection with the Citicorp loan, TOUSA’s subsidiaries (which were not liable to the Transeastern Lenders) pledged their assets to Citicorp.  The loan proceeds were used to pay the Transeastern Lenders.

Six months after closing, TOUSA and its subs filed bankruptcies, and the Creditors Committee sought to avoid the security interests by the subsidiaries as fraudulent transfers, as well as the payments to the Transeastern Lenders, alleging that TOUSA and its subsidiaries were insolvent at the time and the subs received no value for the transfers.  The bankruptcy court had no difficulty finding that both TOUSA and the subsidiaries were insolvent at the time of the transaction. 

The court found that the subsidiaries had not received reasonably equivalent value for their pledges, as is required to sustain the transfers under the fraudulent transfer law.  The court rejected arguments that the subsidiaries had received various indirect benefits from the transaction.  The court therefore ordered the Transeastern Lenders to return the payments they received. 

The court also found that Citicorp had not acted in good faith because it knew that the debtors were insolvent.  The court held that the security interests granted by the subsidiaries to Citicorp were therefore avoidable.  After subsequent published appeals, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the bankruptcy court’s decision. 

The decision ought to be a cautionary lesson for lenders relying on guaranties or pledges of third party assets.  The TOUSA risks exist even when the third parties are in fact the borrower’s subsidiaries.  In order to understand the nature of the risk, it is important for lenders to be represented and advised by competent legal counsel.     

© Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, PA, 2014. All rights reserved.

About the Author

David E. Peterson, bankruptcy, creditor's rights, attorney, Lowndes, law firm
Of Counsel

Dave Peterson has a broad background in bankruptcy and creditors’ rights, as well as commercial litigation, in general. Dave represents lenders, creditors and lessors in sophisticated Chapter 11 reorganizations and Chapter 7 liquidations. He has represented creditors in negotiating Chapter 11 bankruptcy plans, as well as litigation concerning confirmation of bankruptcy plans. He has handled preference litigation, fraudulent conveyance claims, exemption litigation, and a wide range of other kinds of litigation arising out of bankruptcies, including appeals. Further, Dave has...

407-418-6306

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be  a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.

The National Law Review - National Law Forum LLC 4700 Gilbert Ave. Suite 47 #230 Western Springs, IL 60558  Telephone  (708) 357-3317 If you would ike to contact us via email please click here.