May 22, 2012

Court of Appeals Revives Milwaukee Sick Pay Ordinance

District IV of the Court of Appeals, (Madison) has reversed the Milwaukee County Circuit Court’s injunction and dismissal of the City of Milwaukee Sick Pay Ordinance. In a 49 page decision issued on March 24, 2011, the Court of Appeals reached a series of conclusions, including that the Ordinance is constitutional, within the police powers of the City, and is not preempted by existing federal and state laws. Our client, the Metropolitan Milwaukee Association of Commerce  (“MMAC”) has the legal right to ask for reconsideration or to appeal to the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

The Milwaukee Sick Pay Ordinance would require employers in the City of Milwaukee to provide nine paid sick days per year to its full-time employees (five paid sick days for employers with fewer than 10 employees).         

The Ordinance was passed by direct legislation by City of Milwaukee voters in November of 2008. The MMAC won an injunction and later dismissal of the Ordinance at the trial court, so the Ordinance (widely criticized by Milwaukee employers and many employees) has not taken effect. In response to the Milwaukee Ordinance, many surrounding communities adopted ordinances to prohibit sick pay mandates at the local level.  

Beyond the MMAC’s continuing legal challenge to block the unconstitutional and ill conceived Ordinance, the Wisconsin state legislature is considering a law that would prohibit a local municipality from adopting a paid sick leave measure. The proposed state law would clarify that mandated employment leaves can only be done on a statewide level and thus avoid the creation of “regulatory islands” in the state.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

Partner

Scott Beightol, a partner in the Milwaukee office, represents businesses in all aspects of employment and labor relations, with special emphasis in litigation of discrimination, non-compete and other matters in federal and state court, the NLRB, and arbitration. Mr. Beightol counsels clients on workforce structure, HR audits and best practices, complex termination and disability/FMLA matters, union avoidance, and union relation matters involving labor negotiations and arbitrations.

414-225-4994

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.