April 23, 2014

New Jersey DEP Denies Initial Waiver Requests

Since August 1, 2012, the New Jersey DEP has been entertaining applications for relief pursuant to its rules governing the waiver of DEP regulations.  In the first two cases in which DEP has decided waiver applications on their merits, DEP denied both waiver requests.

In one case, the applicant sought a waiver from the Filled Water's Edge Rule under the Coastal Zone Management Rules.  DEP denied the waiver application finding that the applicant did not meet any one of the four specified bases for a waiver, and that the applicant did not demonstrate that it satisfied the waiver evaluation criteria.  DEP also found that the applicant failed to demonstrate that the requested waiver would be consistent with the purposes and intent of the Filled Water’s Edge Rule.

In the second case, the applicant sought a waiver from the requirements for remedial action workplans established by the Technical Requirements for Site Remediation.  In denying the waiver application, DEP again found that the applicant failed to establish that it met any of the four bases for a waiver, that it satisfied the waiver criteria, and that the waiver would be consistent with the purposes and intent of the applicable statutes and rules.

These initial decisions confirm that DEP meant what it said at the time it adopted the rules allowing waivers — DEP will grant waiver applications only in limited circumstances that satisfy the narrow criteria specified in the waiver rules.

© 2014 Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C. All Rights Reserved

About the Author

Paul H. Schneider, GIordano Law Firm, Litigation Attorney

Mr. Schneider, co-chair of the Litigation Practice Area, focuses his practice in environmental, redevelopment, land use, regulatory, real estate and affordable housing law, and litigation. Mr. Schneider also handles a wide variety of redevelopment matters as well as corporate and commercial litigation. In addition to handling major litigation before both the state and federal courts and the Office of Administrative Law, he has extensive experience before the New Jersey Supreme Court and the Appellate Division.


Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitabl