Advertisement

May 24, 2013

Union and Non-Union Employers Required to Post New NLRB Notice of Employee Rights

A new National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) Final Rule requires most private-sector employers to post a notice describing certain employee rights such as the “right to organize” under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). While the Final Rule is not balanced between union and employer interests, the Final Rule does address some concerns that many employers had with an earlier proposed version of the rule. For example, one significant change in the Final Rule is the deletion of the requirement that employers distribute the notice via email, voice mail, text messaging, or related electronic communications if they customarily communicate with their employees in that manner. Nevertheless, employers must still post the notice where other workplace notices are typically posted. Moreover, employers who post notices to employees regarding personnel rules or policies on an Internet or intranet site will also be required to post the NLRB notice on their site. However, such postings to an Internet or intranet site will be the only electronic postings required under the Final Rule.

In addition, employers had urged the NLRB to avoid showing bias toward union organizing and add language alerting employees that they also have the right to refrain from engaging in union activity. Employers observed that a more neutral notice would include both the right to engage and not engage in union activity at the beginning of the document, rather than wait to first mention the right to refrain in the affirmative rights section of the notice. As a result, the Final Rule provides that the introduction should include both the right to engage in union and other concerted activity and the right to refrain from doing so. More specifically, the first sentence in the introduction to the notice will state: “The NLRA guarantees the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively with their employers, and to engage in other protected concerted activity or to refrain from engaging in any of the above activity.”

The NLRB believes that the new notice of employee rights is necessary even though they have not conducted any study to determine the extent of employees’ knowledge of NLRA rights.  With little elaboration, the NLRB has stated that such a study is unnecessary. The NLRB believes that many employees protected by the NLRA are unaware of their rights under the statute and that the rule will increase knowledge of the NLRA among employees. The NLRB asserts (without citation to any source) that around 10 percent of employees are unaware of the rights explained in the notice. 

Failure to post the required notices can have significant consequences for employers. For example, if the NLRB finds that the employer has failed to post the required employee notices as alleged, the employer will be ordered to cease and desist from the unlawful conduct and post the required employee notice, as well as a remedial notice. In some instances additional remedies may be appropriately invoked in keeping with the Board’s remedial authority.  Failure to post the employee notice may also affect NLRB proceedings. For example, the statute of limitation for an employee to file an unfair labor practice charge may be tolled and, as a result of an employer’s failure to post the required notice, the NLRB may find it appropriate to excuse the employee from the requirement that charges be filed within six months after the occurrence of the allegedly unlawful conduct. Finally, the NLRB may consider a knowing and willful refusal to comply with the requirement to post the employee notice as evidence of unlawful motive in an unlawful labor practice proceeding in which motive is an issue.

The Final Rule is set forth in Chapter 1, Part 104 of Volume 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations (“CFR”) (available here: http://www.ofr.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2011-21724_PI.pdf).  Subpart A of the rule sets out definitions; prescribes the size, form, and content of the employee notice; and lists the categories of employers that are not covered by the rule.  The notice itself is published in the Appendix of Subpart A. Subpart B sets out standards and procedures related to allegations of noncompliance and enforcement of the rule.

Action Steps

  1. The poster will need to be posted by November 14, 2011, when the new requirements take effect.

  2. Prior to November, employers who wish to maintain a direct relationship with their employees should train their supervisors on the NLRA and effective employee relations.

  3. Likewise, these same employers should create and implement effective communication plans and policies.

Employers who undertake action steps 2 or 3 should consult with legal counsel.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

scott c. beightol, partner, labor and employment law, michael best law firm
Partner

Scott Beightol, a partner in the Milwaukee office, represents businesses in all aspects of employment and labor relations, with special emphasis in litigation of discrimination, noncompete and other matters in federal and state court, arbitration, and before the NLRB and OFCCP. Mr. Beightol counsels clients on workforce structure, HR audits and best practices, complex termination and disability/FMLA matters, and union relation matters involving labor negotiations and arbitrations. Mr. Beightol is Chairman of the law firm and chairs the firm’s Management Committee.

414-225-4994

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.