Advertisement

June 19, 2013

USPTO Extends and Expands the Green Technology Pilot Program

On December 8, 2009, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) implemented a Green Technology Pilot Program (“the Program”) to accelerate the examination of certain “green technology” patent applications filed before December 8, 2009. The green technologies pertain to environmental quality, energy conservation, development of renewable resources, and greenhouse gas emission reduction. The purpose of the Program is to accelerate the development and deployment of green technology, create green jobs, and promote U.S. competitiveness in the renewable sector.

Normally, patent applications are examined in the order they are received by the USPTO. Under the Program, pending patent applications relating to green technology are given special status, and examined by the USPTO out of turn, without meeting all the usual requirements for accelerated examination (e.g., the filing of an examination support document). According to the USPTO, the Program could reduce average pendency times for green technologies by a year or more.

No fee is required to participate in the Program. However, participation in the Program is limited to the first 3,000 grantable petitions to make special, which only will be accepted if all the other Program requirements are met. Initially, the Program also was limited to applications filed before December 8, 2009, and was slated to end on December 8, 2010.

Effective November 10, 2010, the USPTO has extended the Program until December 31, 2011, and expanded the eligibility for the Program to include applications filed on or after December 8, 2009. These changes will permit more applications relating to green technologies to qualify for the Program. A full copy of the notice in the Federal Register announcing the extension and expansion of the Program may be accessed online.

The Program presents a simple no-cost means for expediting USPTO decisions relating to patent applications for green technologies. These time savings may lead to longer patent terms, and may assist inventors and business with efforts to commercialize green technologies.

© MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP

About the Author

michael r. langer, partner, michael best law firm
Partner

Michael Langer is a member of the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the Madison office. His practice focuses on all aspects of intellectual property law, including patent, trademark and copyright law, with an emphasis on drafting and prosecuting U.S. and foreign patent applications in chemistry and life science technologies. Mr. Langer’s chemical experience includes analytical reagents, catalysts, coatings, consumer products, food products, fuel cells, luminescent compounds, pharmaceutical compounds, and chemical processing methods. His life science experience includes protein...

608-283-2268

About the Author

Laura J, Opperman Ph.D. Scientist Michael Best Friedrich LLP
Member

Laura Opperman is a Patent Scientist in the Intellectual Property Practice Group in the Madison office.

608-257-3061

Boost: AJAX core statistics

Legal Disclaimer

You are responsible for reading, understanding and agreeing to the National Law Review's (NLR’s) and the National Law Forum LLC's  Terms of Use and Privacy Policy before using the National Law Review website. The National Law Review is a free to use, no-log in database of legal and business articles. The content and links on www.NatLawReview.com are intended for general information purposes only. Any legal analysis, legislative updates or other content and links should not be construed as legal or professional advice or a substitute for such advice. No attorney-client or confidential relationship is formed by the transmission of information between you and the National Law Review website or any of the law firms, attorneys or other professionals or organizations who include content on the National Law Review website. If you require legal or professional advice, kindly contact an attorney or other suitable professional advisor.  

Some states have laws and ethical rules regarding solicitation and advertisement practices by attorneys and/or other professionals. NLR does not accept advertising from attorneys or law firms. The National Law Review is not a law firm nor is www.NatLawReview.com  intended to be an advertisement or a referral service for attorneys and/or other professionals. The NLR does not wish, nor does it intend, to solicit the business of anyone or to refer anyone to an attorney or other professional.  NLR does not answer legal questions nor will we refer you to an attorney or other professional if you request such information from us. 

Under certain state laws the following statements may be required on this website and we have included them in order to be in full compliance with these rules. The choice of a lawyer or other professional is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. Attorney Advertising Notice: Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Statement in compliance with Texas Rules of Professional Conduct. Unless otherwise noted, attorneys are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, nor can NLR attest to the accuracy of any notation of Legal Specialization or other Professional Credentials.