Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction

Published between:
Published Title Organization
Jan
4
2016
 L-3 Communications Holdings v. Power Survey: Final Written Decision Determining that Reference Supported Finding of Reasonable Expectation of Success IPR2014-00834 Faegre Drinker
Jan
4
2016
 Washington Redskins Haven’t Won Yet: Why Constitutionality of Section 2(a) is Not Yet Final Mintz
Jan
4
2016
 Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics: Final Written Decision Concluding Nexus Not Established IPR2014-01102 Faegre Drinker
Jan
4
2016
 PTO Litigation Center Report – January 4, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
4
2016
 Did PTAB Dose AIA Poison Pill Incorrectly Against Premium Genetics? Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
1
2016
 Arris Group and Cox Communications v. C-Cation Technologies: Order Expunging Supplemental Evidence Exhibits IPR2015-00635 Faegre Drinker
Jan
1
2016
 K.J. Pretech Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLC: Motion for Additional Discovery Authorized Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
 ServiceNow, Inc. v. BMC Software, Inc.: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
 Top Patent Law Stories In 2015 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
31
2015
 PTO Litigation Center Report – December 31, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
31
2015
 Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies v. Premium Genetics (UK) Ltd: Institution of Post-Grant Review of a Patent Issuing from a Transition Application Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
 Hewlett-Packard Co. v. U.S. Philips Corp., et al.: Order Denying Authorization to File Reply to Preliminary Response Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
 Altaire Pharmaceuticals v. Paragon Bioteck: Decision Denying Institution In Part Where Petitioner Had Not Alleged Unpatentability With Sufficient Particularlity Faegre Drinker
Dec
30
2015
 Use of Priority Denial to Subject Apparent "Pre-AIA" Patents to PGR: Inguran v. Premium Genetics Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
30
2015
 TTAB Finds MEAT CANDY to be Too Sweet Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
30
2015
 Square v. REM Holdings 3: Partially Granted Request For Rehearing Of Final Written Decision IPR2014-00312 Faegre Drinker
Dec
29
2015
 Starbucks Corporation v. Ameranth: Instituting Review of Challenged Claims CBM2015-00091 Faegre Drinker
Dec
29
2015
 Can the California Secretary Of State Reject Disparaging Business Entity Names? Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Dec
29
2015
 Don't Blame Patents For High Drug Prices Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
28
2015
 Actifio v. Delphix Corp: Authorized To Cross-Examine After Declaration Was Filed Regardless Of Service Date IPR2015-00014 Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
 Mangrove Partners Master Fund v. VIRNETX: Additional Discovery Regarding Real-Party-In-Interest Denied IPR2015-01046 Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
 Lowe's Home Centers v. Maureen Reddy: Authorization To File Motion For Late Submission of Supplemental Information After Oral Argument IPR2015-00306 Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
 MotionPoint Corp v. TransPerfect Global: Reply to Preliminary Response Authorized To Address Standing CBM2015-00168, 178 Faegre Drinker
Dec
25
2015
 Settle with All Stakeholders Before Trying to Terminate an IPR: Qualcomm Inc. v. Bandspeed, Inc. McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Dec
25
2015
 Factual Inc. v. Locata LBS LLC: Granting Motion to Strike Objections for Being Untimely Faegre Drinker
Dec
24
2015
 Federal Circuit Limits the Safe Harbor Provision and the Scope of § 271(g) McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Dec
24
2015
 Kaiser Aluminum v. Constellium Rolled Products Ravenswood, LLC: Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Dec
24
2015
 Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC: A Solution to Business Problems May Not Be a Technological Invention McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Dec
24
2015
 "Exclusive Ownership” Is Not Necessary for Standing in an IPR McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Dec
24
2015
 Enmos USA Corp. v. Dunnhumby Limited: Decision Denying Institution Where A Technological Invention Exists Faegre Drinker
Dec
24
2015
 Acxiom Corp. v. Phoenix Licensing, LLC: Bare Allegations of Customer Indemnification Not Enough for CBM Standing McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Dec
24
2015
 Propriety of Certificate of Correction Requires Assessment of Teachings of Specification as Whole McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Dec
23
2015
 Inter Partes Review Is Not for Pending Claims McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Dec
23
2015
 Violation of ITC Consent Order Can Be Based on “Infringement” of Invalid Claims McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Dec
23
2015
 Federal Circuit Says USPTO Can’t Refuse Registration of Disparaging Trademarks Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Subscribe to Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters.

 

Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters