Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction

Federal Circuit / U.S. Court of Spec. Jurisdiction
(incl: International Trade (Customs), Federal Claims, Armed Forces, Federal Adm. Agencies & Boards, Immigration, Tax, Gov. Personnel Appeals, Patent , Trademark, Veterans Appeals, etc.)

Custom text Title Organization
Oct
1
2013
Keeping it Out of the Supreme Court McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2013
A Case for Patentability of Software-Based Inventions Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
26
2013
Intema Files Petition for Grant of Certification Re: Patents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
21
2013
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Reexamination Decision is Binding in Concurrent Infringement Litigation Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Sep
16
2013
Predictability Still Needed From Divided Federal Circuit on Software Patents Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Sep
9
2013
Divided Federal Circuit Panel Finds Computer System Claims Not Patent-Eligible Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
31
2013
Detailed Explanation Not the Same as a New Ground for Rejection Re: Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
31
2013
Has the Doctrine of Claim Vitiation Itself Been Vitiated? Re: Patent Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
31
2013
Objective Indicia of Non-Obviousness Must Be Considered Before Concluding Patent Claims Are Obvious McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
31
2013
A Negative Patent Claim Limitation Must Be Supported by the Specification McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2013
A Generic Disclosure Does Not Support Claims to Individual Species Re: Protein Variants and Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2013
Intra-Corporate Trademark Transfers: Beware of the Intent-To-Use Trap Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Aug
30
2013
Patent Claims Are Indefinite Where Claimed “Molecular Weight” Subject to Different Calculations McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
19
2013
Patent Court Further Muddies the Software Patent Waters Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Aug
15
2013
Hamilton Beach v. Sunbeam Products – “On Sale” Bar Clarified Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
15
2013
Bad Faith Patent Litigation Is Bad News For Plaintiffs Bracewell LLP
Aug
4
2013
Course of Conduct Does Not Supplant Unambiguous Terms of an Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
4
2013
No Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction Where Binding Assurances of No Litigation Eliminates Any Possible Justiciable Case or Controversy in Patent Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2013
Federal Circuit Has Appellate Jurisdiction Over International Trade Commission's (ITC) Dismissal of Claim Based on Arbitration Agreement McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2013
Obvious to Try and the Prima Facie Obviousness Patent Infringement Case Novo Nordisk A/S v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Labs. Ltd. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2013
Combination of Prior Art Elements, Each Used According to Their Established Functions, Without a Surprising Result, Invalidates Bone Plate Patent McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2013
Good-Faith Belief in Invalidity, Even if Mistaken, Negates Induced Patent Infringement: Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2013
Patent Claim Limitations Must be Substantially Similar for a Previous Disclaimer to Apply: Regents of the Univ. of Minn. v. AGA Med. Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2013
Labor Board Affirms Ruling that Employer Confidentiality Provision Violates National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) Poyner Spruill LLP
Jul
31
2013
Patent Office Reexamination Nullifies District Court Damages Award: Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Grants Motion for Early Termination of Proceeding Before Covered Business Method Trial Institution Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
25
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Provides More Guidance on Discovery Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
25
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Authorizes SAP to file Opposition to Versata’s Rehearing Request Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
17
2013
More Developments in the Patent Battle between SAP and Versata Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
17
2013
When Does Optionee Have A Legally Binding Right To Shares – Vesting Or Exercise? Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jul
10
2013
A Zinger to IRS: Revisiting Artistes And Sportsmen Treaty Provisions Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jul
7
2013
Impact of Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) Rulings in Court Decisions Katten
Jul
3
2013
Dissenting Opinions in CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
2
2013
SAP Moves for a Stay of Parallel Federal Circuit Action After Patent Trial and Appeal Board Win Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
2
2013
Ultramercial v. Hulu – Judge Rader Clips the Wings of the “Abstract Idea” Exception to Software Invention Eligibility Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
1
2013
Federal Circuit Panel Affirms Finding of No Domestic Industry Based on Ongoing Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
1
2013
No Summary Judgment of Invalidity on Prior Clinical Trials Where Confidentiality Obligations Are Imposed McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
1
2013
Who Has the Burden of Proof? McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2013
Federal Circuit Finds that Arguments Made When Traversing a Restriction Requirement Can Constitute Prosecution Disclaimer McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2013
Source Code Held to Be Relevant and Essential Discovery McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2013
Generic Versions of AstraZeneca’s Pulmicort Respules Enjoined from Launch Pending Appeal in Patent Infringement Case McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2013
No Anti-Suit Injunction Where Foreign Arbitration Controls Resolution of Licensing Dispute McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
30
2013
Immaculate Conception? It Is in the Eye, Re: Inventions McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
29
2013
State Law Claims Involving Allegations of Patent Infringement Do Not Arise Under Federal Patent Law When Purely “Backward-Looking” McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
29
2013
Wyeth v. Abbott Labs. – Picking Plaintiff’s Poison re: Patent Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
28
2013
Claim Term Can Have Different Constructions Depending Upon Context In Patent Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
28
2013
Statements Describing “the Invention” Do Not Limit Claim Scope When Contradicted by Other Statements and Embodiments in Patent Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
28
2013
Patent Claim Terms Are Literally Interpreted McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
28
2013
Abuse of Discretion for District Court to Deny Permanent Injunction in Patent Litigation Case McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
19
2013
Federal Circuit Has Appellate Jurisdiction Even Where Damages, Willfulness Have Not Been Determined McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins