Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Custom text Organization
May
18
2020
 Survey Faxes Offering “Honorarium” Contain “Advertisement” For TCPA Purposes Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
3
2021
 Numerosity and Rule 23: It’s Not (Only) About the Numbers Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jan
26
2023
 American Dairy Queen Corporation Sued in Case Offering Guidance on Interpreting Minnesota’s Franchise Act Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
26
2023
 Minnesota Seeks Comment on PFAS in Products Law Beveridge & Diamond PC
Jun
18
2024
 Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office Indicting Dental Providers for Fraud and Patient Harm. Behavioral Health Providers Are on Notice. Mintz
Sep
13
2013
 Mortgage Foreclosure Opinions From Judge Wilson and Judge Moon Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
27
2015
 Supreme Court Removes Good Faith Belief of Patent Invalidity as Defense to Induced Patent Infringement Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Mar
25
2016
 West Virginia Supreme Court Decision Protects Personal Information of Non-Party Insureds Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Nov
5
2019
 Key Considerations for Global SEP Litigation - Part 2 Mintz
Mar
25
2020
 Don’t Feed Them: Pizza Hut TCPA Settlement Results in $2MM In Fees for Plaintiff’s Lawyers—and A Huge Potential Recovery for the NCLC Troutman Amin, LLP
Nov
5
2020
 Franchisor Wins Attorneys’ Fees and Costs in Termination Decision
Oct
7
2022
 Federal Court Upholds Admissibility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging Testimony Stark & Stark
Jul
7
2023
 SCOTUS Limits Extraterritorial Reach of Lanham Act Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Apr
3
2024
 Fourth Circuit Holds Federal Tax-Exempt Status Does Not Subject Private Independent School to Title IX Responsibility Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Mar
29
2025
 D.C. Circuit Rules Trump Can Remove Independent Agency Members Without Cause Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Aug
8
2025
 Looping in Loper Bright to Require the EEOC to Follow Its Enabling Statute Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jan
14
2016
 Life After Burn Injury: Physical Pain Stark & Stark
Sep
3
2020
 California Court Allows Subcontractor To Pursue Project Owner For Tortious Interference Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
14
2022
 A Conjunction is Worth Thousands of Dollars: Recent Case Highlights Significance of “And” vs. “Or” Proskauer Rose LLP
Apr
18
2023
 Rule 702 Amendments Move Closer to Final Approval, But You (and the Courts) Should Rely on Them Now Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
31
2024
 Promises, Promises: Covenant Not to Sue for Patent Infringement Includes Downstream Users McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Jan
16
2025
 EnforceMintz —Could the Supreme Court’s Decision in Jarkesy Mean the End to HHS Civil Monetary Penalty Authorities as We Know Them? Mintz
May
29
2025
 No Fairytale Ending for Consumer Opposition: RAPUNZEL Reinforces Lexmark Standing Limits McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Jun
20
2013
 Who is a Government Lawyer's Client -- California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) General Counsel Lindh Has a Say Armstrong Teasdale
May
30
2014
 Fujian Newland Computer Co., Ltd. v. Hand Held Products, Inc.: Order Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion to Exclude Faegre Drinker
Nov
10
2015
 Seventh Circuit Affirms Exclusion of Plaintiffs’ Causation Experts in Vinyl Chloride Case Beveridge & Diamond PC
Aug
30
2016
 “Providing . . . Information” to Medical Providers Is Not Given Patentable Weight McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Jan
31
2017
 Supreme Court to Consider BPCIA Requirements for Biosimilars McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Displaying 45725 - 45752 of 50574
Subscribe to The 10 Latest Litigation & Trial Practice Articles
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters.

 

Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters