Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Custom text Organization
Feb
6
2012
Utah Supreme Court Advances Policyholder Rights Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jun
18
2014
University of Virginia Student's Lawsuit Against Virginia ABC (Alcohol Beverage Control Agents) to Continue Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
4
2014
Michigan Continues Close Scrutiny of Related Party Aircraft Leases Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
1
2014
Section 101 and Software Patents: Abstract or Not? Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
8
2016
Dichotomy Between Intent to Injure and Intentional Conduct Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
7
2017
Blockchain Energizer - Volume 12: September 7, 2017 K&L Gates LLP
Jun
9
2020
Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms ‘Severe or Pervasive’ Standard of Harassing Conduct Claims Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
May
1
2021
TikTok Maker Sued for 2.274 billion RMB for Copyright Infringement and Trade Secret Misappropriation in China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
17
2025
Update: US Supreme Court Stays Lower Courts’ Orders Reinstating NLRB and MSPB Members, Removing Them Once Again (US) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
16
2025
UPDATE: First Amendment Freedoms and Federal Funds: Why Harvard’s Stand Matters for All Americans Dilworth Paxson LLP
Apr
6
2011
Challenges For In-House Counsel In Multinational Corporations: Preserving The Attorney-Client Privilege In The Aftermath Of Akzo Nobel Chemicals Ltd. v. European Commission Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Jan
10
2013
New Federal Statute Strengthens Trade Secret Protection Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Apr
14
2014
T-12 Entertainment Speaks Up in Trademark Complaint Over Use of "I Plead the 5th" Mark Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Nov
26
2015
Actifio, Inc. v. Delphix Corp. - Order Granting Motion to Compel Routine Discovery IPR2015-00015, 16, 19, 25, 26, 34, 100, 108, 128 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2018
California Court of Appeal Concludes that Individuals Can Be Personally Liable for Civil Penalties for Wage-Hour Violations Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
13
2020
Texas Appeals Court Rules Private Communications with Customers Not Protected Free Speech McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Apr
15
2020
PTAB Sets Double Standard for Qualifying Reference as “Printed Publication” McDermott Will & Schulte LLP
Jul
21
2020
Maine Internet Privacy Law Survives Challenge Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2022
ROUND 1 TO THE BAD GUYS: FTSA Survives First Serious Constitutional Challenge–But it Won’t Last Troutman Amin, LLP
Nov
2
2022
The Alice Test for Patent Ineligibility in Practice, Part Two: The Federal Circuit Affirms a Dismissal Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
16
2023
Federal Circuit Considers Patentability of Overlapping Ranges Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
3
2024
Loper Bright and Relentless 101: What Regulated Businesses Need to Know at the Dawn of the Post-Chevron Era Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
10
2025
PFAS and Consumer Class Actions: The New Wave of PFAS Litigation Blank Rome LLP
Aug
30
2012
Donegal Mut. Ins. Co. v. Electrolux North America, July 24, 2012 Armstrong Teasdale
Feb
6
2014
Consulting Experts and Improper Contact Armstrong Teasdale
Jun
22
2015
Does Being “Perceived As” Muslim Support A Title VII Claim? One Court Says Yes Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
5
2016
Supreme Court Agrees to Review D.C. Circuit’s Decision That Former NLRB Acting General Counsel Served in Violation of Federal Law Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Dec
5
2016
Ninth Circuit Court Rejects Challenge To Internal Affairs Doctrine Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters.

 

Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters