Antitrust Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

In the United States, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the  Department of Justice (DOJ) regulate antitrust and trade-regulations laws. From guaranteeing market monopolization doesn’t polarize the market, to regulating ‘no-poach’ antitrust agreements between employers, there are many regulations that govern this area of law. The National Law Review covers cases and news from the United States and internationally.

Joint ventures, structural issues, mergers, comparative advertising, price-fixing schemes, discrimination, and distribution constraints are among the different types of news readers will find on The National Law Review. The Antitrust Division of the DOJ highly regulates insider trading, company-organizational schemes, and monopolization by major companies, to regulate a fair and balanced industry for all companies in a given industry.

The International Trade Commission (ITC) regulates international antitrust laws, alongside other international government agencies. Illegal market trades, global competition law, international trade agreements, The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), and Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), are all governed by the US and international government agencies, to guarantee fair dealings internationally. The National Law Review has regular updates on NAFTA negotiations as wells as news regarding the TPP and the United States' role in the treaty.

The Committee of Foreign Investments in the United States is also in charge of the regulation of antitrust agreements and mergers and acquisition deals between US and international businesses. The CFIUS governs investments between two American companies, as well as US-based and international companies who contract in a purchase-sale agreement to determine fairness, and proper balance in negotiations between companies on the international level.

Due to the different laws in the US and around the world, there are many government bodies that regulate and govern the antitrust and trade regulation industry. Not only to maintain a fair balance between trade partners, but also to ensure market monopolization does not occur, allowing major corporations to eliminate smaller, local, and international competitors in their niche. The National Law Review keeps readers up to date with expert legal analysis on these issues.

National Law Review Antitrust TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Antitrust & Trade Regulation law, regulations, and legislation, be sure to follow our Antitrust X (formerly Twitter) feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Antitrust, Mergers, FTC & Unfair Competition News

Title
Custom text Organization
Mar
31
2013
SEC Approves on an Accelerated Basis FINRA Rule Change Relating to Margin Requirements for Credit Default Swaps Katten
Mar
30
2013
Supreme Court Finds That “First Sale” Copyright Doctrine Applies to Works McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2013
Apple Retail Stores Receive Trademark Protection Dickinson Wright PLLC
Mar
29
2013
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Punts on Closely Watched Request to Order a Shale Oil Pipeline Interconnection Bracewell LLP
Mar
29
2013
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Week in Review: March 11 - 15, 2013 Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
29
2013
U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Class Certification in Comcast v. Behrend Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
29
2013
Japan’s Entry Into Trans-Pacific Partnership Free Trade Agreement (FTA) Raises Opportunities and Risks for US Companies McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2013
Abuse of IP Rights Under China's Antitrust Rules: Recent Cases Have a Potentially Serious Impact McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2013
Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Antitrust Issues with "Pay for Delay" Agreements ArentFox Schiff LLP
Mar
28
2013
Raising the Bar: Supreme Court Holds Merits Inquiry Requires Link Between Plaintiff’s Liability and Damages Theories at Certification Stage of Class Action Case Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
27
2013
Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) Schemes: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly Katten
Mar
27
2013
Supreme Court Reverses Certification Order in Comcast Corporation v. Behrend Faegre Drinker
Mar
27
2013
Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in "Pay-for-Delay" Patent Settlement Antitrust Case McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2013
Born on the First of July: The Countdown to Illinois’ New Independent Tax Tribunal McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2013
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Obtains a Vital Win on Antitrust Challenge of Athletic Aid Rules Mintz
Mar
26
2013
From Silver Bullets to Bazookas: Workers’ Innovative Challenge to Wal-Mart’s Employment Practices St. John's University School of Law
Mar
26
2013
Supreme Court Narrows 'State Action' Immunity From Antitrust Laws Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
26
2013
LEGO Builds TM and Breach-of-Contract Case on Allegations that Ex-Licensee Sold LEGO-Themed USB Drives after Sell-Off Period Ended Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
26
2013
India at the Crossroads McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
24
2013
By the Numbers: 7-Eleven Files 2 Trademark Lawsuits in Middle District of Georgia against 9 Total Defendants Regarding 6 Accused Sites Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
24
2013
Seizure of Electronic Data: European Commission Dawn Raid Inspection Guidance Revised McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
22
2013
U.S. Supreme Court Makes Price Differentiation Between Markets More Difficult for Copyright Owners Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Mar
22
2013
Africa Legal Update - March 21, 2013 Mintz
Mar
21
2013
The Copyright Act’s “First Sale” Doctrine Applies to Works Lawfully Made Abroad and Imported to the United States McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
20
2013
Brussels Court of Appeal Rules that Legal Professional Privilege Applies to In-house Counsel McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
19
2013
Suntech Closing Goodyear Solar Plant; Blames U.S. Solar Tariff Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Mar
19
2013
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Lacks Authority Over Commodity Futures Contracts Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
19
2013
Massachusetts District Court Finds No Inference of Conspiracy Arising From Members of Standard Setting Organization Pursuing Self Interest In Refusing To Approve Plaintiff's Competing Technology Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins