Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization
Aug
16
2012
A federal district court in Louisiana addresses amount in controversy requirements in holding that a multi-plaintiff case is neither a class action nor a mass action under CAFA Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
16
2012
Recent Fee Shifting Cases Caution Against Diving into Non-Compete/Trade Secret Litigation Where the Facts Supporting a Violation are Unknown or Questionable Faegre Drinker
Aug
16
2012
Another California Court of Appeal Struggles to Come To Grips with Arbitration Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
16
2012
Northern District of Illinois Holds that Plaintiffs’ Proposal of a Consolidated Trial May Trigger Federal Jurisdiction Under CAFA as a Mass Action Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
15
2012
Florida Rules to Address Electronically Stored Information Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Aug
15
2012
Third Circuit vacates order granting the defendant leave to appeal an order remanding a class action case to state court where post-remand the state court dismissed the case Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
15
2012
Federal district court in NY holds CAFA’s Home State Exception is not jurisdictional, and CAFA imposes no deadline for raising the exception when an action is originally filed in federal court Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
14
2012
Ninth Circuit reverses a remand order where the district court erroneously refused to consider jurisdictional evidence submitted by the removing party Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
13
2012
A Sticky Situation—Secondary Considerations Require NEXUS to the Claimed Invention McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
13
2012
The Seventh Circuit holds that 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d)(9) relating to securities class actions is an exception to CAFA jurisdiction, not a prerequisite Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
13
2012
The Eighth Circuit holds that stipulations filed contemporaneously with a complaint limiting damages to an amount below CAFA’s jurisdictional threshold may be used to defeat CAFA jurisdiction Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
12
2012
Non-Consumer Confusion May Factor into “Likelihood of Confusion” Analysis McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
12
2012
The Ninth Circuit Finds in a Recent Parens Patriae Action that the Case is 99 Persons Short of a Mass Action under CAFA Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
12
2012
False Claims Act Case Questioning Quality of Laboratory Services Unsealed in New Mexico Mintz
Aug
12
2012
Posner to Apple/Motorola: No Damages, No Injunction, No Trial McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
12
2012
House Subcommittee Weighs CAFA Successes and Opportunities Seven Years after the Legislation’s Enactment Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
11
2012
An Arkansas District Court Holds That a Stipulation as to the Amount in Controversy Contained in the Body of the Complaint is Sufficient to Defeat CAFA Jurisdiction Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
10
2012
The Seventh Circuit Examines CAFA Amount in Controversy Evidence under the Legally Impossible Standard Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
10
2012
Tax Court Makes Significant Amendments to Privilege and Discovery Rules McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
10
2012
A Federal District Court in Florida Awards Attorneys’ Fees to the Plaintiff Based on the Defendants’ Improvident Removal of the Case Pursuant to CAFA More than Two Years After the State Court Complaint was Filed Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
9
2012
The Second Circuit Interprets the Securities Exception to CAFA Jurisdiction and Remands a Case to State court Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
9
2012
A California District Court Holds that Defendant’s Proof of Amount in Controversy Falls Short of Both the Preponderance of the Evidence and the Legal Certainty Standards Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Aug
7
2012
Judge Clamps Down on DOJ Efforts to Apply U.S. Law Abroad Ifrah Law
Aug
5
2012
California Court of Appeal Decision Shows Lingering Hostility to Arbitration Agreements Despite Concepcion Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
4
2012
USPTO Issues Interim Examination Procedure for Subject-Matter Eligibility Analysis Under Prometheus McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
3
2012
Florida Courts Adopt Rules Specifically Addressing Electronic Discovery Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Aug
2
2012
Theft of Employee Data from Third-Party Vendor Exposes Employer and Vendor to Privacy Class Action Mintz
Aug
2
2012
Non-Settling Insurer Had No Right to Seek Equitable Contribution Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jul
30
2012
Offers of Judgment Support Dismissal of Wage and Hour Claims Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
30
2012
Rejecting Milward: A “Weight of the Evidence” Methodology is No Methodology At All Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
28
2012
Failure to Issue Written Legal Hold Is Not Gross Negligence Per Se Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jul
26
2012
Search and Collection of Data Efforts Critiqued in FOIA Case Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jul
26
2012
The Latest, but Perhaps Not Last, Word on the Pleading Requirements for Direct and Indirect Infringement Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Jul
25
2012
Ninth Circuit Takes a Bite Out of Kellogg Mini-Wheats Cereal Class Action Settlement Mintz
Jul
20
2012
Indiana Supreme Court Nixes Summary Judgment on Alleged Fraudulent Nature of "Out of Trust" Sales Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
17
2012
Exit the Dragon: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Cybersquatting Claim on Bruce Lee’s “Jeet Kune Do” Mark Brought by Non-Owner Martial Arts Instructor McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
14
2012
Board’s Invalidity Finding Is Affirmed, Notwithstanding District Court’s Prior Validity Ruling McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
12
2012
Take This Tip: Class Actions Suits Under the Massachusetts Tip Act Are on the Rise Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jul
12
2012
RCC Consultants Will Pay $45,000 to Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Lawsuit U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Jul
12
2012
Party Seeking Preliminary Injunction Must Demonstrate a Nexus Between the Patented Feature and the Consumers’ Decision to Purchase Its Product McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
11
2012
Ambiguous Incorporation-by-Reference Language Breaks Continuity Link McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
10
2012
Complaints Need Not Include Facts Which Would Support a Prima Facie Case of Discrimination under McDonnell Douglas Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
10
2012
Foreign Defendants Cannot Avoid Personal Jurisdiction in One District by Consenting to Personal Jurisdiction in Another McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
10
2012
Federal Circuit Affirms Jury Verdict of Invalidity Based on On-Sale Bar and Public Use McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
9
2012
Secondary Considerations Evidence Must Be Considered Before a Court Reaches a Decision on Obviousness McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
9
2012
Twombly and Iqbal Redux; Form 18 Is the Pleading Standard for Direct Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
8
2012
The Final Curtain Call? Not Quite Yet New Standard of Review for Willfulness McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
8
2012
Supreme Court: Juries Must Determine Facts That Increase Maximum Criminal Fines McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
8
2012
Michigan Appellate Court Allows Bank to Foreclose by Advertisement Varnum LLP
Jul
8
2012
New Jersey Court Affirms Sanction Against Law Firm For Losing Emails Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins