Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Jun
20
2023
The EU’s “AI Act” Advances Vedder Price
Jun
19
2023
The After Effects of the Music Modernization Act in the Digital Streaming Sphere Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
19
2023
The inexplicable not explained in UK government’s Response to non-competition consultation Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
18
2023
District Court Finding Doesn’t Preclude PTAB Proceeding McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
18
2023
Absent Nexus Secondary Considerations Come in Second McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
18
2023
Quack, Waddle and Duck: Order That Grants Injunctive Relief Is an Injunction McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
18
2023
Draft Bill on Name, Image, and Likeness: Uniform Standard Contract, Medical Trust, NCAA Authority Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jun
17
2023
How Big a Deal Is “Trump Too Small”? – SCOTUS Today Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jun
16
2023
The Nine Greatest Experts on the Internet, NOT! – The Supreme Court Considers the Algorithm in Google and Twitter Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
16
2023
In Jack Daniel’s case, Supreme Court Rejects Ninth Circuit’s Expansive View of First Amendment Rogers Test Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
16
2023
The Supreme Court Weighs in on Jack Daniel’s v. Bad Spaniels Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Jun
16
2023
Update on AI Legal Challenges Robinson & Cole LLP
Jun
16
2023
How a Zero-Day Flaw in MOVEit Led to a Global Ransomware Attack Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Jun
16
2023
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
16
2023
Australia: Regulating AI – Emerging Issues K&L Gates
Jun
16
2023
Generative AI Providers Subject to Reduced CDA Immunity Under Proposed Legislation Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
15
2023
Obviously Prima Facie Case Overcome by Secondary Considerations McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
15
2023
Noncompetes Are in the NLRB’s Crosshairs – Can Trade Secret Protections Save Them? Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Jun
15
2023
Breach of Open-Source License Claim Against AI Coding Assistant May Continue, Court Says ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jun
15
2023
Why Is Virtually Nobody Talking Seriously About New York’s Potential Noncompete Ban? Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jun
15
2023
“TRUMP TOO SMALL” Trademark Decision Heads to Supreme Court McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
15
2023
Supreme Court Chews Up and Spits “Bad Spaniels” Back to District Court Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jun
15
2023
What Is Generative AI? Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jun
15
2023
Blue Gentian’s Efforts to Maintain Sole Inventorship Were Hosed by the Federal Circuit Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Jun
14
2023
2022 Annual Report of the China National Intellectual Property Administration: 955,000 Patent Applications Were ‘Abnormal’ Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
14
2023
And No Longer Trending: 7 FAQs Regarding the Federal Contractor TikTok Ban Blank Rome LLP
Jun
14
2023
Interoperability of Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law Examined by Congress Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
14
2023
Chatbots in the Workplace: Usage Policies and Practical Considerations Related to Artificial Intelligence Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jun
14
2023
Trademark Basics for Business Owners: Monitoring for Trademark Infringement Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jun
14
2023
Healthier Choices Management Corp. v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. No. 22-1268 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
13
2023
Ninth Circuit Holds that Registration of a Single Photography Database Supports Award of Statutory Damages for Each Individual Photo in the Database Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
13
2023
Supreme Court Affirms Andy Warhol’s Prince Series Not Transformative Fair Use Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
13
2023
AI: The Washington Report — New AI Disclosure Bill and AI Strategic Plan Update Mintz
Jun
13
2023
Supreme Court’s Jack Daniel’s Decision Clarifies First Amendment Parody Defense in Trademark Infringement Cases Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
13
2023
Defeating Obviousness Rejections by Arguing Against Improper Prior Art Modifications Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jun
13
2023
Re-Setting the Balance: Jack Daniels’ Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products, LLC Polsinelli PC
Jun
12
2023
Supreme Court Limits Transformative Use Standard in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Jun
12
2023
Unanimous Supreme Court: Consumer Confusion is Trademark Infringement Test, Even for Punny Parodies Bracewell LLP
Jun
12
2023
Common Sense: Nonparties Not Precluded by Ex Parte Reexamination Termination McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
12
2023
Proposed Digital Asset Market Structure Bill Could Give Regulatory Clarity; But is it the Regulatory Clarity the Industry Wants? Polsinelli PC
Jun
12
2023
Florida’s Consumer Privacy Law Signed by the Governor Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
12
2023
USPTO Announces Slate of Proposed Rule Changes Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
12
2023
The Generative AI Revolution: Key Legal Considerations for the Hospitality Industry ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jun
12
2023
Bad News for Bad Spaniels: SCOTUS Sides with Jack Daniel’s in Trademark Case Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Jun
12
2023
Florida Governor Signs Data Privacy Law Focused on Children, Search Engines and Billion Dollar Businesses Mintz
Jun
10
2023
The EU Approach to AI Regulation: Texts That Generative AI Will Not Come Up With Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
9
2023
Supreme Court: Parody Not a Shield from Trademark Infringement Mintz
Jun
9
2023
Tomato Troubles: NatureSweet Files Third Lawsuit Against Angel Sweet Over Product Packaging ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jun
9
2023
EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS: Intellectual Property — The Vulnerable Icon: Prince, Warhol, and the Supreme Court’s Latest on Copyright Law [podcast] Mintz
Jun
9
2023
A 20-Year Consent Order Prohibiting the Use of Non-Compete Agreements – Antitrust Byte Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins