| Dec 15 2016 |
Reduced Scope of Post-IPR Estoppel Imperils Litigation Stays |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Dec 15 2016 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 15, 2016 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Dec 15 2016 |
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari to Review Patent Venue Statute |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Dec 14 2016 |
Federal Circuit Rules That Physical Combinability Does Not Drive an Obviousness Inquiry |
Hunton Andrews Kurth |
| Dec 14 2016 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 14, 2016 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Dec 14 2016 |
International Trademarks: Arctic Chill Remains in ICELAND Dispute |
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP |
| Dec 13 2016 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 13, 2016 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Dec 12 2016 |
Supreme Court Signals Shift in Approach to Damages in Design Patent Infringement Cases |
K&L Gates LLP |
| Dec 12 2016 |
Supreme Court Rules Against Apple in Design Patent Case with Samsung, Remands to Federal Circuit to Formulate Test for Identifying Relevant “Article of Manufacture” |
Mintz |
| Dec 12 2016 |
Federal Circuit Reverses PTAB Patent Invalidation Based on Lack of APA Due Process |
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP |
| Dec 12 2016 |
With U.K.’s Announcement, European Unified Patent Court Moves Toward Realization |
Mintz |
| Dec 12 2016 |
Intellectual Property: In re NuVasive – Explain Yourself! |
Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A. |
| Dec 12 2016 |
Second Chance for Supplemental Register Registrations: Debunking “Myths” about Re-Filing on Principal Register |
Faegre Drinker |
| Dec 10 2016 |
Michael Jordan’s Trademark Victory in China: A Lesson Learned for International Companies |
Armstrong Teasdale |
| Dec 9 2016 |
ALJ Reverses Prior Domestic Industry Finding In Light of Lelo Inc. v ITC |
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP |
| Dec 9 2016 |
For Design Patent Damages 'Article of Manufacture’ Not Necessarily Entire End Product |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
| Dec 9 2016 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 9, 2016 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Dec 8 2016 |
Cannabis Conundrum: Hurdles to Trademark Protection in a “Growing” Industry |
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP |
| Dec 8 2016 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 8, 2016 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Dec 7 2016 |
New Requirements for Copyright Safe Harbor |
Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP |
| Dec 7 2016 |
U.S Supreme Court Revisits Design Patent Damages |
Vedder Price |
| Dec 7 2016 |
U.S. Supreme Court Alters Standard for Design Patent Damages and Takes Apple's $400 Million Victory Over Samsung Away (At Least for Now) |
Katten |
| Dec 7 2016 |
Brexit’s Effect on UK Unitary Patent System and Court |
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP |
| Dec 7 2016 |
Supreme Court Holds Profit from Components of Infringing Product Can Be Appropriate Measure of Design Patent Damages |
Michael Best & Friedrich LLP |
| Dec 7 2016 |
UK Keyword Advertising – Novel Questions of Honest Concurrent Use and Passing Off |
Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP |
| Dec 7 2016 |
Supreme Court Addresses Design Patent Damages for First Time in 120 Years: New Era of Design Patent Damages Dawn |
Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP |
| Dec 7 2016 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 7, 2016 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Dec 7 2016 |
Oscar-Worthy Expert Disproves $7M In Damages |
IMS Legal Strategies |
| Dec 6 2016 |
Supreme Court Complicates Design Patent Damage Calculation – Apple v. Samsung |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Dec 6 2016 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 6, 2016 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Dec 6 2016 |
PTAB Holds Oral Hearings In Tecfidera Patent IPR and Interference |
Foley & Lardner LLP |
| Dec 6 2016 |
Online Service Providers – Important Update – Copyright Safe Harbor |
Vedder Price |
| Dec 5 2016 |
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 5, 2016 |
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. |
| Dec 5 2016 |
Going All the Way: Second Circuit Jury Awards $14.5 Million in Trade Secrets Lawsuit |
Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. |
| Dec 2 2016 |
US Supreme Court to Review Patent Exhaustion Doctrine |
McDermott Will & Schulte LLP |
