UCC

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which was initially introduced in 1952, is one of the uniform acts which have been put into law, to govern the purchase/sale agreements in the United States and internationally, dealing with commercial transactions and other business dealings. All 50 states have adopted the UCC, the District of Columbia, and U.S Territories have also adopted the acts, in an attempt to better manage commercial transactions in the country.

The National Law Review features news, stories, and legal information dealing with commercial transactions and contracts which are entered into, by parties agreeing to terms laid out in the UCC. News coverage on the site includes topics for both individuals and business entities, who are doing business outside of their home state. The UCC is effective when individuals and businesses, from different states, intend to do business or contract to do business, across state borders. The National Law Review covers the latest stories and transactions, and litigation, which deals with terms of sale, contract terms, and parties who don’t comply with contract terms, as they are laid out by the Uniform Code.

Breach of confidentiality, breach of contract terms, implied warranty of merchantability, materiality provisions, indemnification terms, insurance, products liability, requirements contracts, clickwrap agreements, deposit account control agreements, and other news, stories, and litigation, related to the UCC, are covered by the National Law Review. Visitors can also read about topics such as duty of care owed by contracting parties, contractual limitations imposed on parties, lessee's rights and duties, buyer’s remedies and obligations, and other terms which are specific to commercial transactions, by parties that are bound by the Uniform Commercial Code based upon the type of goods/services, and the amount in question.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Organization
Oct
9
2013
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Enforces a Negotiated Limitation of Liability Provision Consistent With Indiana Law Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
8
2013
Fifield Appeal Denied – New Rule Regarding Consideration for Restrictive Covenants in Illinois Survives Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
7
2013
Westburg Decision Provides Strong Lever for Lenders von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Oct
4
2013
Federal Court Orders Tuomey to Pay $237 Million for Violations of the Stark Law and False Claims Act Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
4
2013
The False Claims Act is Not a License to Divulge Employer Confidences Mintz
Oct
3
2013
Will Issuers Add SEC Rule 506(d) Bad Acts To The Definition Of “Cause”? Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Oct
3
2013
Important Virginia Supreme Court Employment Law Decision Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.
Oct
2
2013
The Forum-Selection Clause in Your Franchise Agreement: Why it’s Important Armstrong Teasdale
Oct
2
2013
The North Carolina Supreme Court: Metrics for 2013 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
27
2013
Robert Frost and Cybersecurity - Two Roads Diverging Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
27
2013
No More Playing Cute With Non-Solicitation Obligations: First Circuit Court of Appeals Rejects "Customer Called Me First" Argument Mintz
Sep
27
2013
Details: Highlights from the August & September 2013 Federal Register Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
27
2013
Canada's First Foreign Bribery Conviction Shows Trend in Increased Enforcement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
24
2013
Are You Compliant? New Public Records Act Impacts Government Contractors in Florida Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Sep
23
2013
Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) New Rules Target Veterans and Individuals with Disabilities Faegre Drinker
Sep
23
2013
Buy-Sell Agreements Re: Businesses Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.
Sep
16
2013
Massachusetts Governor Would Like to Join California As a Non-Noncompete State Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
14
2013
Summary Judgment For Assignee of Note and Guaranty Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
13
2013
California Requires New Online Disclosures: Specifics Unclear Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
11
2013
When Is a Non-Binding Term Sheet or Letter of Intent Enforced as a Binding Contract? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
11
2013
Refrigiwear Seeks to Protect Trademarks and Copyrights in the United States from Encroachment by Parties Holding Limited International Rights Pursuant to Contract Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
11
2013
5 Things Landlords and Tenants Need to Know About Subrogation Clauses von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Sep
11
2013
A Federal District Court in Florida Finds Hospital System Properly Terminated a Professional Services Contract for a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) Breach Dickinson Wright PLLC
Sep
9
2013
Non-Compete and Non-Solicitation Agreements: Consideration Rules the Day, at Least for Now Much Shelist, P.C.
Sep
6
2013
U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) Publishes Final Rule to Improve Job Opportunities for Veterans and Persons With Disabilities Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Sep
5
2013
Decision on Elusive “Inevitable Disclosure” Doctrine Underscores Key Steps to Protect Company Information Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
5
2013
Discovery from Data Storage Providers: Building a Silver Lining into Your Cloud Storage Contract Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
1
2013
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Issues Interpretation of “Actual Delivery” Katten
Aug
31
2013
Contract Has Latent Ambiguity if Objective Evidence Supporting Reasonable Alternative Meaning Exists McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2013
Do You Have Restrictive Covenants In Texas? If So, Be Careful What You Ask For Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
30
2013
CDA Wealth Consulting v. Global One Re: Insurance Litigation Faegre Drinker
Aug
30
2013
Qui Tam Case Against Tremco, Inc., Alleging Defects In BURmastic Roofing Systems, Settles For $60 Million Tycko & Zavareei LLP
Aug
29
2013
Argentina's Financial Fate Now Depends on the U.S. Supreme Court Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
25
2013
Does My Email Communication Constitute a Binding Agreement? Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Aug
24
2013
California Court of Appeal Allows Tenant's Fraud Suit Against Shopping Center Landlord Based on Estimates for Real Property Taxes, Insurance and Common Area Maintenance Fees in Letter of Intent to Proceed Katten
Aug
23
2013
Quick on the Trigger - Period for Contractors to Comment on Past Performance Evaluations Will Shrink from 30 Days to 14 Days Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
23
2013
Federal District Court Orders Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to Produce Records Regarding New Drug Application Pursuant to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Mintz
Aug
22
2013
Lots of Little Things - Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Updates from the Federal Acquisition Circular Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
21
2013
Site Plans: Does 'X' Mark the Spot? Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Aug
20
2013
Significant Illinois and Massachusetts Non-Compete Rulings Faegre Drinker
Aug
16
2013
Arbitration Agreements with Class and Collective Action Waivers Enforced Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Aug
16
2013
Free(er?) Trade - US, EU and Canada Quibble Over Market Access and Domestic Preferences Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
12
2013
Employee Non-Compete Agreements in Mergers and Acquisitions McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
Aug
12
2013
Rights upon Delivery – or When? Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
11
2013
Settlement Agreements – The Devil is in the Lack of Details – Part I. Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.
Aug
10
2013
Zappos and It's Effect On "Browswrap" Agreements Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Aug
9
2013
Lost Writings And The Statute Of Frauds Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Aug
9
2013
Another Union Attempt to Circumvent Michigan’s Right to Work Law: Controversies in Michigan Continue Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
8
2013
Contractual Provisions Disclaiming Attorney-Client Relationship Fail To Let Lawyer Off The Hook Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Aug
8
2013
The Power of Non-Compete Agreements in Litigation Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins