March 29, 2020

March 29, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 26, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Congress Passes Trade Bills - Trade Promotion Authority, Trade Preferences Extension Act

On June 24 and 25, 2015, lawmakers in Congress passed two long-awaited trade bills: a bill providing the president with Trade Promotion Authority (TPA); and a bill reauthorizing the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP), and tariff preference levels for imports from Haiti. The Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, which reauthorizes AGOA and GSP also includes provisions concerning antidumping, tariff classification, and offsets. The last bill providing TPA expired on July 1, 2007. Similarly, GSP expired July 31, 2013. The bills have been sent to President Obama for his signature. We anticipate that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will then provide guidance on the implementation of the law.

The Trade Preferences Extension Act extends GSP through December 31, 2017, an, perhaps just as importantly, provides retroactive relief to eligible products that were imported during the program’s lapse. This retroactive application of GSP duty preferences is significant given that many pending GSP claims would otherwise be time-barred based on finality of liquidation provisions under the customs laws.  

The last time around, importers who continued to claim GSP upon entry by claiming the proper Special Preference Indicator (SPI) and paying duties received refunds automatically after GSP was renewed. Importers who did not claim GSP at the time of entry had to file a request with CBP within 180 days after the new GSP bill was signed into law in order to receive the GSP duty preference (either by Post Summary Correction or Protest, depending on liquidation status). No retroactive claims were allowed after the 180-day period.

A similar provision appears in the current renewal bill. However, this time there are likely to be liquidated entries outside of the reach of the administrative protest mechanism that are eligible for refunds. The bill states that entries of covered articles to which preferential treatment would have applied during the period between July 31 through the effective date (30 days after the law is enacted by President Obama’s signature) will be liquidated or reliquidated as though the entry occurred on the effective date. Moreover, the bill specifically states that it will not be limited by the time period in which importers have to protest an entry under 19 U.S.C. § 1514. However, importers who did not claim GSP at the time of entry will still only have 180 days after the effective date to file refund requests with CBP.

While we await CBP’s implementation instructions, importers should consider the best method for claiming GSP duty-free treatment on entries made after July 31, 2013, since the bill allows for retroactive application. Accordingly, we recommend that importers carefully track entries that would qualify for GSP treatment to prepare for the timely filing of claims and to ensure that all appropriate duties are refunded. Although importers who claimed GSP treatment at the time of entry received automatic refunds the last time the program lapsed, those who do not receive refunds within a few months after the law takes effect may want to consider contacting CBP or submitting a list all eligible entries along with a specific request to reliquidate.

© 2020 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

William Rucker, Drinker Biddle Law Firm, International Trade and Customs Specialist
Partner

William R. “Randy” Rucker assists clients with all aspects of U.S. Customs law, including the classification and valuation of merchandise, country of origin and marking determinations, quantitative import restraints, duty-preference and savings programs, understanding and receiving the benefits of free trade agreements, compliance audits, enforcement actions and other trade-related matters.

In order to assist clients with their compliance efforts and satisfy "reasonable care" requirements, Randy frequently performs reviews of companies' internal...

312-569-1157
Mollie Sitkowski, Drinker Biddle Law Firm, Chicago, Trade Law Attorney
Associate

Mollie D. Sitkowski assists clients in ensuring their internal processes meet Customs' "reasonable care" standard. She assists clients with various aspects of trade law, including valuation, classification, free trade agreements, country of origin determinations, and auditing their import documentation to identify potential issues and risk areas. Mollie also supports clients with export compliance, including advising on export screening and classification, and filing license classification requests and voluntary disclosures with the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) and the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC). She works with clients to obtain beneficial outcomes from Customs' administrative processes by filing PEAs and Protests, submitting ruling requests, and filing prior disclosures. Additionally, Mollie assists in drafting briefs to the Court of International Trade and Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concerning tariff classification disputes for firm clients.

In General. Mollie earned her law degree from Chicago-Kent College of Law, where she was a Chicago-Kent Honors Scholar and on the Dean’s List. While in law school, Mollie was a paralegal with the firm’s Customs & Trade practice. She earned her bachelor’s degree cum laude from University of San Diego.

312-569-1502