May 22, 2022

Volume XII, Number 142

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 20, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 19, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

D.C. Circuit Resuscitates Elimination of Companionship and Domestic Service Exemptions for Third-Party Employers

What Happened?

The ongoing legal battle over the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) Final Rule changing the definitions of “companionship services” and live-in domestic employees again turned against employers on August 21, 2015. The US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued its decision in Home Care Association of America v. Weil and unanimously reversed a lower court decision holding the DOL exceeded its authority when it issued the Final Rule. The Final Rule was to take effect on January 1, 2015, but enforcement was stayed pending the appeal.

What Changes in the Final Rule?

Companionship services are redefined as follows:

  • Provision of “fellowship and protection” for an elderly person or person with an illness, injury, or disability who requires assistance in caring for himself or herself.

  • Provision of “care” if the care is provided attendant to and in conjunction with the provision of fellowship and protection and if it does not exceed 20% of the total hours worked per person and per workweek.

“Fellowship and Protection” is redefined as follows:

  • “Fellowship” means to engage the person in social, physical, and mental activities.

  • “Protection” means to be present with the person in his or her home or to accompany the person when outside of the home to monitor the person’s safety and well-being.

  • Examples of fellowship and protection include conversation; reading; games; crafts; accompanying the person on walks; and going on errands, to appointments, or to social events with the person.

“Care” is redefined as follows:

  • “Care” performed attendant to and in conjunction with the provision of fellowship and protection and if they do not exceed 20% of the employee’s total hours worked per workweek per consumer.

  • Assistance with activities of daily living (such as dressing, grooming, feeding, bathing, toileting, and transferring) and instrumental activities of daily living, which are tasks that enable a person to live independently at home (such as meal preparation, driving, light housework, finance management, assistance with the physical taking of medications, and medical care arrangements).

  • Medically related services provided by trained personnel (RN, LPN, CNA) are not included in companionship services.

  • Live-in domestic service workers who reside in an employer’s home permanently or for an extended period must receive minimum wage and overtime if they are jointly employed by a third party.

Under the Final Rule, third-party employers of direct care workers (such as home care staffing agencies) are not permitted to claim either the exemption for companionship services or the exemption for live-in domestic service employees. The exemption is unavailable even when the employee is jointly employed by the third-party employer and the individual, family, or household using the services. However, the individual, family, or household may claim any applicable exemption.

What Now?

The plaintiffs representing the home care industry recently announced plans to appeal the D.C. Circuit’s decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, so the final outcome is uncertain. For now, employers in states such as North Carolina and South Carolina without state laws already requiring minimum wage and overtime pay for these employees are back where they were in December 2014: facing the prospect of having to pay minimum wage and overtime to companionship services employees and live-in domestic service employees, and having to satisfy all recordkeeping requirements under the FLSA for these employees. Employers can potentially reduce wage expenses by managing schedules and staffing to minimize overtime (e.g., 40-hour workweeks only, or split schedules such as 25-hour worrkweeks followed by 50-hour workweeks) and by lowering base wages to reduce the overtime impact, keeping in mind they must pay at least minimum wage. Alternatively, employers can hire additional staff and split client services among multiple staff members to reduce or eliminate overtime obligations.

The August 21, 2015 order from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals became effective October 13, 2015 because the opponents of the Final Rule were not successful in having that date stayed pending further appeal. DOL did not begin enforcement of the Final Rule until November 12, 2015. From November 12, 2015 through December 31, 2015, DOL will exercise discretion in whether to enforce the Final Rule, with consideration given to the extent to which employers make good faith efforts to comply with the Final Rule. Full enforcement of the Final Rule will begin January 1, 2016. In addition to DOL enforcement of the Final Rule, individual employees might file FLSA lawsuits claiming violations of the law. Prudent employers should consult with employment counsel about best strategies for managing this risk while the legal process continues to the Supreme Court.

© 2022 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.National Law Review, Volume V, Number 342
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Kevin M. Ceglowski, Employment and Labor Lawyer, Poyner Spruill, Law Firm
Partner

Kevin represents employers in many areas of labor and employment law, including race, age, gender, religion, national original, and disability employment discrimination claims, wrongful discharge claims, and wage and hour claims. He defends clients before administrative agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Labor, and the North Carolina Employment Security Commission, in state and federal courts, and in arbitrations. Kevin also provides guidance to management to ensure employment practices are in full compliance with all...

919-783-2853
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement