February 8, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 39

Advertisement

February 08, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 07, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 06, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Eleventh Circuit Limits Scope of False Claims Act (FCA) Whistleblower Suit

Late last month, a three-judge panel of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated portions of a former executive’s False Claims Act (“FCA”) whistleblower action against Health Management Associates Inc. (“HMA”), alleging that the company engaged in an illegal to generate referrals of Medicare and Medicaid patients to its facilitates.

In its ruling, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of plaintiff-relator Michael Mastej’s claims relating to events in 2008 and 2009.  It only reversed the Middle District of Florida’s dismissal of Mastej’s allegations concerning events in 2007.  The district court had dismissed his claims for failure to satisfy the heightened pleading standards of Rule 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The court noted it employs a “nuanced, case-by-case approach” to the Rule 9(b) analysis, emphasizing that there are no “bright-line rules.”  The panel concluded that Mastej’s personal knowledge of and active participation in HMA’s business and revenue operations in 2007 – when he served as a Vice President and the CEO of one of HMA’s hospitals – provided the “the required indicia of reliability” to support many of his allegations.  The Eleventh Circuit reinstated Mastej’s claims as they related to conduct in 2007, despite the fact that he did not provide details about a single claim submitted to Medicare for reimbursement as part of the illegal kickback scheme alleged in his complaint.

The court, however, ruled that Mastej’s allegations from 2008 and 2009 were those of a “corporate outsider” because he left to work for an HMA subsidiary in 2007.  As such, after 2007, he did not have access to details regarding HMA’s business practices.  His allegations from that time period therefore lacked the indicia of reliability necessary to satisfy Rule 9(b)’s particularity requirement.  The court concluded that Mastej failed to provide the factual basis necessary to support his assertion that the alleged scheme continued after 2007.

Although Rule 9(b) analyses are necessarily case and fact specific, the Eleventh Circuit’s decision reminds defendants to carefully scrutinize qui tam complaints to ensure that the plaintiff’s allegations are sufficiently supported.  Moreover, defendants can use this decision to rebut arguments that personal knowledge of past alleged wrongdoing is sufficient to support allegations that the wrongdoing continued beyond the period when the plaintiff had personal knowledge.

A copy of the 11th Circuit’s decision is available here.

© 2023 Proskauer Rose LLP. National Law Review, Volume IV, Number 328
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Guy Brenner, Labor Attorney, Proskauer Rose, arbitration proceedings Lawyer
Partner

Guy Brenner is a partner in the Labor & Employment Law Department and co-head of the Non-Compete & Trade Secrets Group. He has extensive experience representing employers in both single-plaintiff and class action matters, as well as in arbitration proceedings. He also regularly assists federal government contractors with the many special employment-related compliance challenges they face.

Guy represents employers in all aspects of employment and labor litigation and counseling, with an emphasis on non-compete and trade secrets issues,...

202-416-6830
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement