February 17, 2020

February 14, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

The Energizer - Volume 41

There is a lot of buzz around blockchain technology, distributed energy resources (“DERs”), microgrids, and other technological innovations in the energy industry. As these innovations develop, energy markets will undergo substantial changes to which consumer and industry participants alike will need to adapt and leverage. Every other week, K&L Gates’ The Energizer will highlight emerging issues or stories relating to the use of blockchain technology, DERs, and other innovations driving the energy industry forward. 


  • On March 12, OVO, a UK-based energy company, announced that its newly formed technology division, Kaluza, recently invested in Electron’s “distributed flexibility marketplace.” Electron is a UK-based company that creates blockchain platforms that facilitate energy asset registration, flexibility trading, and coordinate usage of distributed energy resources. According to Ovo, “[t]he development of Electron’s shared asset register will be crucial to supporting the growth of Kaluza and deliver on its mission to securely connect all devices to an intelligent zero-carbon grid.” Kaluza’s ultimate goal is connect “Internet of Things” devices to electric grids, and use distributed ledger technology to improve electric grid data and functioning.

  • On March 13, 2019, Saudi Aramco announced a pilot program integrating blockchain technology to improve quality, safety, and administration of production lines. Aramco’s program will work to confirm the origin and quality of the oil products with the goal of eventually assessing the entire supply chain of petroleum. Saudi Aramco is touting the benefits of blockchain in an interview with Sputnik News, stating that “[blockchain] has a lot of advantages in ensuring the quality of the product and the sources of the product.” Blockchain technology will improve the transparency and traceability of transactions, while reducing transaction costs and increasing data integrity.


  • Hurricane Maria hit Puerto Rico on September 20, 2017, severely damaging the island’s electric grid and disconnecting most households from power. For almost an entire year, the island experienced rolling blackouts. Cognizant of the electric grid’s critical weaknesses and the risk of future storms precipitating subsequent blackouts, the Puerto Rico Energy Commission(“PREC”) issued the Regulation on Microgrid Development (the “Regulation”) in May 2018. PREC’s goal is to promote energy resilience by implementing a “stable and predictable regulatory framework” under which communities can develop sustainable microgrids. Ultimately, the PREC believes microgrids will promote “customer choice and control,” “increase system resiliency,” and “foster energy efficiency and environmentally sustainable initiatives."

  • The Regulation creates a regulatory framework categorizing microgrids and defining the scope of their permissible activities. It categorizes microgrids by ownership, and divides them into three types: personal, cooperative, and third-party. Personal microgrids provide power to one or two consumers and can—with PREC permission—provide excess energy and grid services to neighboring customers. Cooperative microgrids are microgrids owned and developed jointly by three or more energy consumers. Cooperative microgrids also may sell excess energy and services to third-parties. Lastly, third-party microgrids are microgrids whose primary purpose is to sell energy services. The PREC must approve a third-party microgrid’s rates before it can sell energy. Certain cooperative microgrids and third-party microgrids are also subject to reporting requirements.

  • In order for microgrids to function effectively, the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”) will need to incorporate them into a customer-centric Integrated Resources Plan (“IRP”). To this end, PREPA recently issued its first IRP focused on decentralized generation and the growth of solar and storage resources. The PREC rejected the plan, however, citing numerous problems, including PREPA’s failure to submit a proposed interconnection regulation tied to the Regulation. PREPA has until April 14 to resubmit a plan.

  • The not-for-profit sector may be rallying behind the PERC’s push for microgrids. Environmental Defense Fund (“EDF”), for instance, announced a three-year collaboration with the government of Puerto Rico to building low-carbon microgrids in some of the island’s most rural areas. EDF intends to develop a holistic package that addresses the structural barriers preventing the effective implementation of microgrids in such communities. The microgrids will rely on solar power and battery storage technology. Puerto Rico’s pivot to sustainable microgrids could help promote energy resiliency by enabling communities to draw electricity from battery storage devices during blackouts. It’s possible that Puerto Rico’s model could provide a pathway for other utilities at risk o of natural disasters and climate change, like California’s investor-owned utilities.


  • On March 25, 2019, trade press reported that Puerto Rico’s Congress passed the “Puerto Rico Energy Public Policy Act.” The bill that seeks to ensure that the island’s electric grid operates solely on renewable energy by 2050. To achieve this goal, the bill aims to promote greater adoption of distributed energy generation and storage. An unofficial translation of the bill states that parties to energy deals will “identify the most effective and economical ways to make the electrical infrastructure of Puerto Rico more distributed, intelligent, resilient, reliable,” among other things. The bill also highlights the use of microgrids as a “reliable, robust and decentralized system that promotes resilience, integrates new technology, sources of renewable energy, avoids the loss of energy in indispensable service facilities and provides alternatives to consumers.” The bill is now before the governor who has previously expressed his support.

Copyright 2020 K & L Gates


About this Author

Buck B. Endemann, KL Gates, energy infrastructure lawyer, remediation projects attorney

Buck Endemann is a partner in the firm’s San Francisco office, where he is a member of the energy practice group. He provides comprehensive counseling on energy, infrastructure and remediation projects, including advice on air, water and waste compliance issues, and represents clients in related litigation. 

Mr. Endemann has extensive experience on the commercial, land use, and regulatory aspects of renewable energy and infrastructure projects throughout the Western United States, with an emphasis on California. He has a particular expertise...

Benjamin Tejblum, KL Gates Law Firm, Energy Law Attorney

Benjamin Tejblum is an associate in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office and focuses his practice on energy and infrastructure projects and transactions. Mr. Tejblum’s clients include electric utilities, electric transmission owners, independent power producers, power marketers, and public utility holding companies that are active in the electricity markets in the United States. Mr. Tejblum regularly represents clients before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and has counseled clients on matters involving mergers and acquisitions, interconnection procedures and agreements, transmission rates and cost allocation, and market-based sales of energy. Mr. Tejblum also counsels energy start-up companies on a variety of regulatory matters.

Daniel Cohen, KL Gates Law Firm, Washington DC, Finance Law Attorney

Daniel Cohen is a first year associate in the Washington, D.C. office.

Admitted only in Virginia / Not Admitted in D.C.
Supervised by Soyong Cho, member of D.C. Bar

Toks A. Arowojolu, KL Gates Law Firm, Washington DC, Environmental and Energy Law Attorney

Toks Arowojolu is an associate in the Washington, D.C. office where she is a member of the oil & gas and power practice groups. She focuses her practice on energy regulatory law and assists clients with navigating the FERC process. She also conducts regulatory due diligence for clients exploring M&A opportunities.

*Admitted only in Maryland / Not Admitted in D.C.
Supervised by David Wochner, member of the D.C. Bar