May 7, 2021

Volume XI, Number 127

Advertisement

May 06, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 05, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 04, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Filing a Motion in Family Court During Coronavirus: What Constitutes an Emergency?

As our courts effectively remain closed for regular business, most courts are only hearing what are deemed emergency motions while scheduling others out for much later hearing dates via telephone or Zoom. But the question becomes, what does the court consider to be an emergency? For instance, many parents have real concerns about their children exercising parenting time in the other parent’s home if someone living there is an essential worker, whether that be a doctor, nurse, truck driver or employee of a grocery store. But is that an emergency? That alone does not rise to the level of denying parenting time or an emergency motion to suspend parenting time. What if a parent tells the other parent that a person living in his home has a fever but still wants to exercise parenting time? Is that an emergency? Likely not. Another parent insists that his child get on a plane from an area with no COVID to come into an area that has been considered a hot bed. That the parenting time might be exercised in a hot bed does not likely make it an emergency, but that the child will have to travel to an airport, sit on a plane and travel out of an airport might. In other words, that child will not be able to social distance and certainly could have greater risk to being exposed. While the courts want parents to follow the parenting time orders, they also seem to favor limiting people's movements in accomplishing that compliance.

Every scenario must be evaluated individually, but most judges seem to agree that that an emergency must meet the standards for seeking ex parte relief (relief provided without notice to the other side and no initial hearing). Parties request ex parte relief by asking the court to enter an order based on the belief that irreparable injury will occur if the court does not enter the order immediately. This happens in cases where the party is concerned that if the other party is provided notice of the relief sought, the notice itself could or would precipitate negative or harmful events.

Scenarios arising due to COVID or the stay-at-home orders are not exactly the same, but judges seem to be applying that standard. Irreparable injury gives a basis for the standard to use when determining whether your particular facts are an emergency for being heard by the family court quickly. Likely the parents have already had a discussion, sometimes heated, as to what is in the best interests for the children. They do not agree, and one parent insists on exercising parenting time. If the parent believes that irreparable injury would occur or if the likelihood is so great given the specific facts, then a motion might be filed to have the court determine what is in the best interests of the child. 

If you have a situation or believe you will have a situation coming up soon, it is advisable to contact a lawyer to discuss your situation. Sometimes talking it through with a lawyer is helpful, and a lawyer can provide strategies to possibly rectify the situation outside of court, such as an offer of specific makeup parenting time or an attempt at mediation if time allows

Advertisement
© 2021 Varnum LLPNational Law Review, Volume X, Number 128
Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Shalini Nangia Family Law Attorney Varnum Ann Arbor, MI
Counsel

Shalini is a member of the Family Law Practice Team. She specializes in family law litigation, including high-income and high-asset divorces, custody and parenting time, child support, paternity, property division, retirement benefits and post-judgment matters. Her goal is to help clients during one of the most difficult times of their lives get from Point A to Point B in the most efficient and painless manner possible.

Shalini is a trained mediator and an adjunct faculty member teaching family law at the University of Detroit - Mercy School of Law, as well as a regular presenter...

734/372-2928
Julia A. Perkins Family Law Attorney Varnum Novi, MI
Partner

Julia is the chair of the Family Law Team and works with clients in family law matters including divorce, child custody, child support and parenting time matters. She has unique experience with international custody cases and valuation and division of high net worth marital estates. She is also a certified mediator with a focus in family law.

Julia's experience also includes representing clients in commercial litigation.

Practice Areas

  • Family Law
  • Adoption
  • Business Owners: Valuations
  • Custody, Parenting Time and Child Support
  • ...
248/567-7427
Erika L. Salerno, Kalamazoo, MI, Family Law attorney, Varnum
Counsel

Erika handles family law litigation matters including complex divorces, initial and post judgment child custody matters, change of domicile, paternity, minor guardianship and third-party custody cases involving multistate jurisdictional issues across southwest Michigan. As a domestic relations mediator, she is frequently retained by other lawyers to mediate their most challenging cases. Trained in Collaborative Law, Erika has worked with clients using the Collaborative Law Process since she was trained in 2000.

In addition to her family law...

269- 553-3549
Advertisement
Advertisement