October 28, 2020

Volume X, Number 302

Advertisement

October 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 26, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Frequently Asked Questions on COVID-19 Personal Injury Litigation

Plaintiffs’ attorneys are advertising for plaintiffs infected by COVID-19, and new COVID-19 personal injury lawsuits are being filed at a steady clip. In recent lawsuits, for example, employees and customers have sought to recover for financial and emotional damages caused by long-lasting COVID-19 symptoms and, in some cases, death. These developments suggest that companies will likely see increased personal injury litigation alleging the transmission of COVID-19. Below are some common questions and considerations about this new type of litigation. 

If an employee sues for an alleged workplace transmission of COVID-19, does workers’ compensation exclusivity apply? 

State laws vary greatly as to whether illness or death from COVID-19 is exclusively covered by state workers’ compensation programs. A few states, such as California, adopted a rebuttable presumption that certain categories of workers are presumed to have contracted a workers’ compensation occupational disease if they become ill with COVID-19. Most states have not adopted a rebuttable presumption and allow employers to deny claims where the employee’s infection more likely occurred outside of work, such as during a period of extensive community spread. Even if an employee’s workers’ compensation claim is denied, employers may argue that state exclusive remedy protections bar tort claims outside the workers’ compensation system.

However, many states recognize an exception to workers’ compensation exclusive remedy protections in instances of gross negligence or intentional harm. Recent COVID-19 personal injury complaints filed in state or federal courts attempt to fit within these exceptions by alleging that employees were denied access to adequate personal protective equipment, or that employees received false information about the safety of the workplace and the likelihood of contracting COVID-19 at work. Regardless of whether these allegations are true, they are designed to circumvent workers’ compensation exclusive remedy provisions. 

Is there tort immunity for companies that follow mitigation guidelines? 

A few states have passed laws limiting tort liability for in-state businesses. To date, Idaho, Nevada, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming have passed laws granting some measure of immunity to businesses for injuries related to the transmission of COVID-19, and legislation is pending in many other states and at the federal level. These laws vary greatly as to the types of businesses covered and the extent to which businesses must follow local health department guidance to qualify for the immunity. In addition, immunity may not apply in cases where plaintiffs allege gross negligence or intentional torts — the same types of allegations that may create an exception to workers’ compensation exclusivity. Many of the complaints already filed contain similar allegations of intentional wrongdoing by the defendant businesses. 

How soon do injured workers or customers need to file their personal injury lawsuits? 

Most states require civil tort claims be filed two years after injury; a few states extend the statute of limitations to three years. For injuries or deaths occurring early in the pandemic, the statute of limitations will not begin to run out until March of 2022, meaning companies will continue to face potential litigation for several years after the pandemic subsides. 

What can I do to prepare my business for potential lawsuits? 

While there’s no way to prevent exposure to potential lawsuits alleging workplace COVID-19 exposure, there are some steps that can reduce that risk and position a business to successfully defend a lawsuit. Those include:

  • Following Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and state and local requirements and guidelines, which continue to change over time 

  • Creating and updating a written COVID-19 prevention plan and policies that document measures taken and when 

  • Responding promptly to employee complaints about COVID-19 safety and documenting those complaints as well as the company’s response 

  • Staying abreast of what others in your industry are doing and employee claims they may be facing

Legal developments are rapidly changing as the pandemic unfolds, and understanding evolving regulatory requirements, industry best practices and litigation trends are key to effective preparation.

© 2020 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 267
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Sarah Brew Food Attorney Faegre Drinker
Partner

Sarah Brew has a national reputation for effectively defending food industry clients against labeling and class action consumer fraud claims and representing food processors, distributors and retailers in foodborne illness and contamination cases and supply chain disputes. She also assists food and dietary supplement clients with compliance matters.

Food Litigation Defense

Sarah has served as national counsel in foodborne illness cases arising from many major outbreaks, involving products such as eggs, spinach,...

1 612 766 7470
Molly E. Flynn Partner Philadelphia pre-trial activities, written discovery, fact and expert depositions,motion practice
Partner

Molly E. Flynn focuses her practice on the defense of pharmaceutical and medical device companies in complex litigation, including actions brought by state attorneys general, personal injury actions and mass tort litigation.

Molly serves as local and national counsel in litigation involving medications and medical devices, including antipsychotics, anticoagulants, antiepileptics, and pelvic mesh, and defends against a variety of claims, including false claims act violations, consumer protection act violations and negligent failure-to-warn. Molly also has significant experience litigating for and defending against claims for statutory attorneys’ fees.

215-988-2836
Jeff Beck, Indianapolis, employment litigation, Faegre Drinker
Partner

Jeff Beck defends and counsels companies in employment litigation and compliance issues, with a focus on representing employers in Occupational Safety & Health Administration litigation and enforcement matters. Jeff has served as a Chapter Editor of the Bloomberg Law and American Bar Association’s Occupational Safety and Health Law treatise (Third and current Fourth Editions). He defends businesses in employment discrimination, harassment, retaliation and wrongful discrimination matters in state and federal court and before governmental agencies nationwide. Jeff proactively works with...

317-237-8329
Tyler A. Young Litigation Attorney Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath Minneapolis, MN
Partner

Tyler Young focuses on litigation for food companies, complex class action defense, and trade secret litigation. He has won motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment, defeated class certification, obtained preliminary injunctions and other expedited relief, and reversed losses and defended victories on appeal.

Food Company Litigation

Tyler focuses on litigation for food companies. He has represented food company clients in consumer class actions, claims brought by nonprofit organizations, commercial disputes with vendors and suppliers, and litigations related to...

612-766-8610
Advertisement
Advertisement