September 18, 2019

September 17, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 16, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Guilty Convictions in Salmonella Trial May Signify Landmark in Criminal Food-Safety Prosecutions

This space has thoroughly explored the various forms of civil liability food companies face for the mislabeling and/or deceptive marketing of their products.  Last week, a set of landmark convictions in a criminal food-safety prosecution potentially signal increased criminal liability for food companies when matters of public health and safety are at play…

On Friday, September 19, 2014, a federal jury convicted two former executives of a peanut-processing company of conspiracy and other charges in connection with a massive Salmonella outbreak in 2009, which killed nine people, sickened 700 others, and led to one of the largest U.S. recalls ever.  Stewart Parnell, former owner of Peanut Corporation of America (PCA), and other former employees were convicted of conspiracy, mail, and wire fraud in violation of federal anti-fraud and conspiracy statutes, and the introduction of misbranded food into interstate commerce in violation of Sections 331(a) and 333(a)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA). Parnell alone was also convicted of the introduction of adulterated food into interstate commerce in violation of Sections 331(a) and 333(a)(2) of the FDCA; he could face more than three decades in prison.

At trial, prosecutors presented evidence to establish that Parnell and other PCA employees knowingly and willingly participated in a conspiracy to conceal that PCA’s products were contaminated with food-borne pathogens, such as Salmonella.  For example, prosecutors argued that the PCA employees defrauded customers (such as Kellogg Co. and General Mills Inc.) by concealing the fact that their products tested positive for pathogens and for fabricating test results to show their products were pathogen-free when in fact there had been no testing or tests had actually revealed the presence of pathogens.

According to experts, the case is one of the first felony convictions of a food processor under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.  Over the last several years, there has been an increased focus by federal prosecutors on food-safety cases such as this one.  Earlier this year, the owners of an Iowa egg company were indicted in connection with a 2010 Salmonella outbreak and, last year, the owners of a Colorado cantaloupe farm pleaded guilty to federal misdemeanor charges related to a 2011 listeria outbreak.  So what does all this mean?  Food processors should perk up and pay more attention to their products’ food safety than they have in the past, or else they risk facing criminal liability for their actions.  Food companies incorporating ingredients from processors into their products, meanwhile, should evaluate their supply agreements with those processors to ensure they are indemnified by the processor for any deceptive or criminal actions taken by the processors without their knowledge.

©1994-2019 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Staying in compliance with federal, state, Canadian, and international consumer product safety requirements and responding appropriately when there’s a potential hazard or product defect can help you avoid costly fines and enforcement actions as well as safeguard your organization’s reputation with consumers. Mintz Levin's Consumer Product Safety Practice is known for its capabilities and knowledge of product safety laws, regulations, and policies, including those of the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), Health Canada, the European Union, Asia, individual US...

202-434-7311