May 22, 2022

Volume XII, Number 142


May 20, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 19, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

House Proposal Targets Charitable Deductions for Conservation Easements by Passthrough Entities

On Sept. 13, 2021, the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee announced a proposal to limit charitable deductions for conservation easement contributions made by partnerships and other passthrough entities. The proposal, which targets syndicated conservation easement transactions, would disallow a taxpayer’s charitable contribution deduction when it exceeds 2.5 times the taxpayer’s modified basis in the passthrough entity. The proposal also addresses the application of the accuracy-related penalty and statute of limitations to conservation easement transactions. If enacted, the House proposal would make it considerably more difficult for taxpayers to prevail in cases involving conservation easement transactions. 

Background on Syndicated Conservation Easements and IRS Enforcement Efforts

Under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 170, a taxpayer is permitted a charitable deduction for contributing a qualified real property interest to a qualified organization exclusively for conservation purposes. An individual taxpayer’s charitable deduction is typically limited to 50% of his or her adjusted gross income. Promoters and advisors have established syndicated conservation easements to circumvent the deduction limitations for individual taxpayers. In the typical syndicated conservation easement transaction, a passthrough entity is established to acquire real property, and investors acquire interests in the passthrough entity in exchange for a fee. The passthrough entity then grants a conservation easement to a tax-exempt organization, such as a land trust. Under the partnership tax provisions, the entity’s charitable contribution deduction passes through to the investor partners. In some cases, the syndicated conservation easement transactions produce charitable deductions that far exceed the amounts invested in the passthrough entity.

The IRS has aggressively pursued abusive conservation easement transactions for over a decade. In Notice 2017-10, the IRS identified syndicated conservation easement transactions as listed transactions that expose taxpayers to heightened reporting requirements and increased penalties. In November 2019, the IRS announced a coordinated campaign to target syndicated conservation easement transactions. In June 2020, the IRS made a time-limited settlement offer to taxpayers with pending docketed Tax Court cases. The IRS has been successful in litigating the conservation easement cases in Tax Court and continues to identify new cases for audit.

Summary of House Proposal

The House proposal would significantly limit the use of syndicated conservation easements. If enacted, it would provide as follows:

  • Disallowance Rule. A taxpayer’s charitable contribution deduction would be disallowed where it exceeds 2.5 times the taxpayer’s modified basis in interests in the passthrough entity.

  • Exception Where Three-Year Holding Period Is Satisfied. The disallowance rule would not apply to conservation contributions where the three-year holding period is satisfied. The holding period is satisfied three years after the latest of the last date on which the passthrough entity acquired any portion of the real property subject to the conservation easement or any partner/member acquired an interest in the passthrough entity.

  • Exception for Certain Family Partnerships. The House proposal provides a limited exception to allow for contributions made through family partnerships.

  • Application of the Accuracy-Related Penalty. The House proposal confirms that the accuracy-related penalty would apply to any underpayment attributable to the disallowance of a conservation easement transaction under the proposed rule. Such a disallowance would be deemed a gross valuation misstatement, and a penalty equal to 40% of the understatement would apply. There would be no reasonable-cause defense to the 40% accuracy-related penalty. Finally, the IRS would not be required to obtain supervisory approval under IRC Sec. 6751(b) prior to assessing the accuracy-related penalty.

  • Applicable Statute of Limitations

– For returns filed for partnership taxable years beginning before Jan. 1, 2018, tax may be assessed against the partners within two years following the date on which a final partnership administrative adjustment may no longer be petitioned to the U.S. Tax Court.

– If a conservation easement deduction is disallowed under this proposal, it will be deemed a listed transaction that must be disclosed to the IRS. Therefore, the statute of limitations for assessment will not expire until one year after the earlier of: (i) the date on which the transaction is disclosed to the IRS; or (ii) the date on which a material advisor satisfies the disclosure requirements under IRC Sec. 6112.

  • Effective Date- The House proposal would be made retroactive for all transactions occurring after Dec. 23, 2016 (i.e., the date of Notice 2017-10).


It remains to be seen whether the House proposal will be enacted, but it appears to have bipartisan support. In the meantime, the IRS continues to aggressively identify, audit, and litigate cases involving syndicated conservation easements. Taxpayers who have invested in conservation easement transactions should consult their tax advisor to understand how the pending legislation and ongoing IRS enforcement efforts affect them.

Co-authored by Jennifer A. Vincent

©2022 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved. National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 263

About this Author

G. Michelle Ferreira, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, Tax And Private Fund Litigation Attorney

G. Michelle Ferreira is an attorney in the Silicon Valley Office and counsels individuals, partnerships, estates and corporations in tax disputes with the Internal Revenue Service and state and local tax agencies, including the California Franchise Tax Board, the State Board of Equalization, the Employment Development Department and county assessment appeals boards.

As a former tax litigator for the Internal Revenue Service, Michelle brings unique experience to clients who have complex and sensitive tax and penalty disputes. Michelle represents...

Barbara Kaplan, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, New York, Tax and Corporate Law Litigation Attorney

Barbara T. Kaplan, named one of the top 50 women lawyers in New York City by Super Lawyers magazine, focuses her tax litigation practice on domestic and foreign corporations, partnerships, and individuals in federal, state, and local tax examinations, controversies and litigation, including administrative and grand jury criminal tax investigations.

Areas of Concentration

  • Tax compliance counseling

  • Offshore account reporting

  • Sensitive...

Courtney Hopley, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, San Francisco, Tax Law Attorney
Of Counsel

Courtney A. Hopley represents clients in federal and state tax controversies before the IRS and the California Franchise Tax Board at the audit, collection, appeals and litigation stages. She works on tax controversy matters involving partnerships, corporations, individuals, real estate and penalty disputes. Additionally, Courtney has experience in tax planning involving entity formation, mergers and acquisitions, and reorganization transactions.

Areas of Concentration

  • Civil tax controversies

  • ...
Jared E. Dwyer White Collar Criminal Attorney Greenberg Traurig Miami, FL

Jed Dwyer focuses his practice on white collar criminal matters, criminal and civil tax litigation, and other complex civil litigation. Jed has tried more than 40 jury and non-jury trials and has been involved in over 100 investigations and prosecutions, many of which included complex fraud and regulatory matters. Jed leverages his experience to represent individuals and organizations in investigations and other proceedings concerning tax fraud, money laundering, public corruption, complex international financial crime, financial institution fraud, and violations of the Bank Secrecy Act,...

Scott Fink, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, New York, Finance, Tax and Litigation Attorney

Scott E. Fink specializes in civil and criminal federal and state tax controversies and litigation. He represents corporations, partnerships, estates and individuals before the Internal Revenue Service, and state and local tax authorities in examinations, collection problems, administrative appeals, and in court.

Areas of Concentration

  • Federal and state tax controversies and litigation

  • Tax audits