May 29, 2022

Volume XII, Number 149

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 27, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 26, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

How much is that college degree worth? Maybe not so much.

Perusing recent opinions, we came upon a bankruptcy case in the First Circuit of some interest, In re: Palladino 17-1334.

Steven and Lori Palladino sent their child, Nicole, to Sacred Heart University, a private Roman Catholic university in Connecticut, whose values, according to its web site, include pursuit of truth, promotion of the common good, and recognition of the dignity and worth of every being. The school “embraces a vision for social justice and educates students in mind, body and spirit to prepare them personally and professionally to make a difference in the global community.” (Sacred Heart University Mission Statement)

Unfortunately, Steven and Lori were also running a multimillion dollar Ponzi scheme at the time. They were convicted of fraud  and the SEC obtained a $9.7 million civil judgment against them. They filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, and the trustee sought to claw back $64,000+ in tuition they paid to Sacred Heart for Nicole’s education over a two-year period.

The test for such a claw back under bankruptcy law is whether Mom and Dad received “reasonably equivalent value” in exchange for their tuition payments.

The answer, the First Circuit held (CJ Howard writing, joined by Judges Torruella and Lynch), was nope. This result is apparently in line with other circuits. At least where there’s no parental obligation to pay (Nicole was eighteen), educating your kid doesn’t cut it for claw back purposes. While the bankruptcy court had concluded that payment based on the belief that “a financially self-sufficient daughter offered [the parents] an economic benefit,” that argument did not succeed at the appellate level.

So, any of you folks ponying up massive amounts for your kids’ tuition, what’s the moral of the story? That the diploma isn’t worth anything to you, at least from a bankruptcy perspective? Maybe.

But perhaps the best lesson is not to engage in the fraudulent scheme precipitating the need for the claw back.

In the end, the loser is, of course, the school – which is perhaps why Wiggin & Dana filed an amici brief on behalf of many institutions of learning, to no avail.

©2022 Pierce Atwood LLP. All rights reserved.National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 325
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Whether confronted with a complex commercial matter or a class action, Pierce Atwood's nationally-recognized litigation attorneys consistently get results for their clients in a practical and efficient manner.

Pierce Atwood's litigation lawyers have successfully litigated a broad variety of matters in state and federal trial and appellate courts and agencies, as well as a variety of alternative dispute resolution settings.  Regardless of the type of case, the Litigation Group takes great pride in partnering with its clients to formulate and execute on the right approach to serve the...

207-791-1302
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement