Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Mar
4
2015
The United States Postal Service and The United States of America, as represented by the Postmaster General v. Return Mail, Inc. Decision on Request for Rehearing Faegre Drinker
Mar
18
2015
Garmin Int’l, Inc. v. MSPBO, LLC: Decision on Institution IPR2014-01379 Faegre Drinker
Mar
20
2015
Kamada, Ltd. v. Grifols Therapeutics Inc: Denying Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00899 Faegre Drinker
Mar
24
2015
Volkswagen Group of America v. Emerachem Holdings, LL: Granting Motions to Submit Corrected Translations IPR2014-01555, 01556, 01558 Faegre Drinker
Apr
1
2015
Paramount, Twentieth Century Fox, and Universal Studios v. Nissim Corp: Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00961, 00962 Faegre Drinker
Apr
3
2015
Petroleum Geo-Services v. WesternGeco: Granting Institution of Review IPR2014-01475 Faegre Drinker
Apr
7
2015
Motorola Mobility v. Intellectual Ventures: Granting Institution CBM2015-00004 Faegre Drinker
Apr
24
2015
Kaspersky v. Uniloc: Denying Institution IPR2015-00178 Faegre Drinker
Jun
11
2015
REG Synthetic Fuels LLC v. Neste Oil Oyj, Final Written Decision Granting Motion to Amend IPR2014-00192 Faegre Drinker
Jun
19
2015
Riverbed Tech v. Silver Peak Systems: Final Written Decision Suggesting that Motivation Reference need not be Printed Publication IPR2014-00245 Faegre Drinker
Jun
29
2015
Bank of the West v. Secure Axcess: Patent Owner’s infringement suits is a factor in determining whether a patent is a covered business method, CBM2015-00009 Faegre Drinker
Feb
21
2012
CMS’s Proposed “Sunshine” Regulations: Implications for Research Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2015
Square v. REM Holdings 3: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable as Obvious Over Evidence of Copying Faegre Drinker
Aug
14
2015
Smart Modular Tech v. Netlist: Denying Authorization to Seek a Subpoena to Compel Testimony Faegre Drinker
Aug
24
2015
Customplay v. Clearplay: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable as Obvious IPR2014-00430 Faegre Drinker
Aug
27
2015
Coalition For Affordable Drugs v. Acorda Therapeutics: Denying Institution Where Displayed Posters Were Not Found to be Printed Publications IPR2015-00720, IPR2015-00817 Faegre Drinker
Nov
8
2012
Patent War Between St. Jude Medical and Volcano Has Mixed Results Faegre Drinker
Oct
8
2015
Praxair Distribution, Inc. v. INO Therapeutics, LLC, Granting Institution Despite Use of References Previously Considered During Prosecution IPR2015-00893 Faegre Drinker
Oct
12
2015
Intri-Plex Technologies v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Rencol: Denying Motion to Expunge Information Regarding Manufacturing Practices and Customers IPR2014-00309 Faegre Drinker
Oct
19
2015
Viglink v. Linkgine: Conduct of the Proceeding CBM2014-00184, -00185 Faegre Drinker
Oct
23
2015
Jewelry Channel d/b/a Liquidation v. America’s Collectibles Network: Reverse Auction Claims Found Ineligible for Patent Protection CBM2014-00119 Faegre Drinker
Nov
2
2015
Symphony Health Solutions Corp. v. IMS Health: Claims Unpatentable Under Alice CBM2015-00070 Faegre Drinker
Nov
4
2015
TRW Automotive US LLC v. Magna Electronics Inc., Institution Granted In Part Because Only Some Of The Grounds Included A Full Analysis IPR2015-00960, 61 Faegre Drinker
Nov
11
2015
Bungie v. Worlds: Denying Motion for Discovery IPR2015-01264, 1268, 1269, 1319, 1321, 1325 Faegre Drinker
Nov
24
2015
Apple v. Smartflash: Granting Institution in Part Where Intervening Case Law Was Found Insufficient to Prevent Estoppel as to One Challenged Claim CBM2015-00131 Faegre Drinker
Dec
8
2015
ETS-Lindgren v. Microwave Vision: Denying Institution for Lack of Identification of Corresponding Structure Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
Lowe's Home Centers v. Maureen Reddy: Authorization To File Motion For Late Submission of Supplemental Information After Oral Argument IPR2015-00306 Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies v. Premium Genetics (UK) Ltd: Institution of Post-Grant Review of a Patent Issuing from a Transition Application Faegre Drinker
Jan
5
2016
Seagate Technology v. Enova Tech Corp: Nexus Between Secondary Consideration And Claims Was Not Sufficient IPR2014-01449 Faegre Drinker
Jan
13
2016
HTC Corp. v. Advanced Audio Devices: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Unpatentable and Denying Motion to Amend IPR2014-01154 Faegre Drinker
Jan
23
2016
AVX Corporation v. Greatbatch Ltd - Granting-in-Part Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing IPR2015-00710 Faegre Drinker
Feb
2
2016
Whole Space Industries v. Zipshade Industrial - Subsequent Petition Denied Pursuant to Section 325(d) IPR2015-01632 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.: Decision on Institution Granting Joinder IPR2016-00167 Faegre Drinker
Feb
12
2016
Maxlinear, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation - Granting Motion to Compel Routine Discovery Cited in Patent Owner Response IPR2015-00592; IPR2015-00594 Faegre Drinker
Feb
23
2016
NHK Seating of America v. Lear Corp: Final Written Decision Finding Most Of The Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01200 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins