Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Mar
15
2011
March Madness Isn't for Everyone - Trademark Usage Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
15
2021
Trade Secret Misappropriation: Denial of Motion for Attorneys’ Fees under CUTSA is Not an Appealable Order Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
15
2011
Federal Court Finds Allegations of "Bad Faith" in Sprinkler License Agreements to be "Vox Clamantis in Deserto" Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
27
2011
Anonymous Bloggers And The First Amendment: When And How Your Company Can Identify Its John Doe Defendants Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2022
Money Laundering and High-Value Art: Treasury’s Study Discusses Financial Crimes and NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
30
2011
RIM Defeats Sherman Act Section 2 Claims At Pleading Stage Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
14
2022
Tokenization and the Law: Legal Issues with NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
12
2023
Another Federal Agency Issues Request for Comments on AI Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
14
2018
The Hammer Falls on the First Major Blockchain-based Art Auction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
6
2023
Ironburg Inventions Ltd. v. Valve Corp. 21-2296 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 3, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
20
2013
Hashtagging Away Your Rights: Privacy and Publicity Rights in Social Media Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
19
2023
The After Effects of the Music Modernization Act in the Digital Streaming Sphere Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
25
2016
Warren Distribution v. Royal Purple – What’s in a Name? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
29
2023
Design Patents Milestone Announced Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
6
2023
SNIPR Tech. Ltd. v. Rockefeller Univ., No. 22-1260 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
24
2023
Sisvel International S.A. v. Sierra Wireless, Inc., No. 2022-1387, 2022-1492 (Fed. Cir. Sept 1, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
18
2023
Federal Circuit Vacates Invalidity Judgement Based on Collateral Estoppel from a Case Subsequently Vacated and Rebukes Plaintiff’s About-Face on Its Stipulated Claim Construction Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
27
2014
Are Circuit Courts of Appeal Split as to the Preclusive Impact Accorded to Prior Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2023
Anticipation and Obviousness in Patent Law: An Analysis of Recent IPR Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
14
2024
Federal Circuit Rules on Inventor-as-Lexicographer Definitions and the Proper Scope of Reply and Sur-Reply Briefing Following Patent Owner Responses to IPR Institution Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
20
2014
FTC (Federal Trade Commission) Targets Reporting of Licensing of Pharmaceutical Patents With Special Rules for Premerger Notification: What You Need to Know Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
6
2019
Left Empty Handed: Value Shut Down on Written Prior Art, Highlighting Importance of System Art Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
7
2020
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Patents – Will the Patent Office Change the Rules? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
10
2024
How to Recover Attorneys’ Fees in a Schedule A Trademark Case in the Northern District of Illinois Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2020
COVID-19 and Trade Secrets: Is Your Business Prepared to Protect its Trade Secrets While Your Employees Work From Home? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
9
2020
4 Steps to More Effectively Use NDAs to Protect Confidential Information Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
16
2020
Delaware 101 Pleading Analysis Leaves Parties Guessing and Prosecutors Moving to Adapt Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
14
2020
Ixchel v. Biogen: California B2B Noncompetes Do Not Per Se Violate B&P Section 16600, and Are Instead Subject to Rule of Reason Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
29
2014
Data Rights Redux – 10 Ways to Preserve Your Intellectual Property Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
5
2021
California Court Strikes Down Overbroad Confidentiality Agreement as a de facto Non-Compete Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
3
2021
Blockchain Patentability Through The Lens Of A Recent PTAB Decision Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
23
2014
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Clarifies “Patent Eligible Subject” Matter in its Recent Guidance in Light of Alice Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
5
2015
Supreme Court Update – Hana Financial v. Hana Bank Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
19
2015
Bargaining with Apple: Understanding the iOS Developer Program License Agreement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2009
What To Do When Your .CN Domain Name Is Already Taken Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins