May 26, 2022

Volume XII, Number 146


May 25, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 24, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

May 23, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

ICC Expands Automatic Application of Expedited Procedure

ICC arbitrations based on agreements entered into in 2021 and beyond will follow an expedited procedure if the amount in dispute is $3 million or less – up from the previous $2 million or less.

This expansion of the automatic applicability of the Expedited Procedure is one of the most significant amendments made to the revised ICC Arbitration Rules 2021, which entered into force on January 1, 2021. It is thus important for parties agreeing to ICC arbitration to be acquainted with the key features of that procedure and with their ability to either opt in or opt out of it.

The Expedited Procedure will apply automatically to disputes up to $3 million unless the parties agree to opt out. Just as importantly, parties are free to opt in to the Expedited Procedure even if the amount in dispute exceeds $3 million.  As a practical matter, parties are likely to be able to agree to opt in or out only at the time they are negotiating the arbitration agreement: whether to do so should thus be considered at that time.

The following five key features of the ICC’s Expedited Procedure should be borne in mind when deciding whether to extend or, on the contrary, exclude its application:

  1. Time limit of 6 months to render the final award: the arbitral tribunal must render its award within 6 months from the date of the first procedural case management conference. This time limit is at the heart of this special procedure. The ICC Court can extend this time limit, but the vast majority of awards since the creation of the Expedited Procedure in 2017 have been rendered within that time limit. (Appendix VI, Article 4.1 of the 2021 ICC Rules)

  1. Sole arbitrator: importantly, even where parties have agreed to three arbitrators, the application of the Expedited Procedure will usually entail the appointment of a sole arbitrator. The objective is to expedite the constitution of the tribunal, promote the tribunal’s ability to decide on both procedure and merits swiftly and reduce arbitrator fees. (Appendix VI, Article 2 of the 2021 ICC Rules)

  1. No Terms of Reference and an early Case Management Conference (“CMC”): the Terms of Reference, usually the foundational document of an ICC arbitration, is dispensed with in the interest of time, and the first CMC must take place within 15 days of the date on which the file was transmitted to the arbitral tribunal. (Appendix VI, Articles 3.1 and 3.3 of the 2021 ICC Rules) 

  1. Document production and submissions are limited: to ensure efficiency, the arbitral tribunal may, after consultation with the parties, decide not to allow requests for document production at all, and to limit the number, length and scope of written submissions, witness statements and expert reports. (Appendix VI, Articles 3.4 of the 2021 ICC Rules)

  1. There may be no hearing: the arbitral tribunal may, after consulting the parties, decide that there is no need for a hearing, in which case neither witnesses nor experts are examined and the dispute is decided solely on the basis of documents submitted by the parties. (Appendix VI, Article 3.5 of the 2021 ICC Rules)

According to statistics published by the ICC, of the 869 registered cases in 2019, 146 cases were conducted under the Expedited Procedure – thus representing approximately 17% of ICC arbitration proceedings. The 2021 Rules revision is expected to drive that percentage up further.  With parties becoming increasingly knowledgeable about the existence of this procedure, it is also likely that they will more often make an affirmative choice on whether – and in which cases – they want the Expedited Procedure to apply.

© 2022 Proskauer Rose LLP. National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 104

About this Author


Sophie Matamoros is an associate in the Litigation Department, and a member of the International Arbitration practice.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Sophie has worked for international law firms where her practice focuses on International Arbitration, representing States and state entities in several ICSID and UNCITRAL investor-state arbitrations.

Sophie received her LL.B. and Master I from Paris I Pantheon-Sorbonne University, her Master II in Business Law from Paris V Descartes University, a Master in Law and International Management from HEC and her LL.M. in International...