Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Oct
4
2023
Generative AI and Copyright – Some Recent Denials and Unanswered Questions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
11
2013
Comments on Recent Changes to the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
3
2019
The U.S. Trademark Office Opens The Door to Registering Certain Cannabis Trademarks Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2013
Federal Circuit Affirms Inequitable Conduct Determination Under Therasense “But For” Exception and Reaffirms Significance of Rohm & Haas Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
4
2023
Computer Love: Beijing Court Finds AI-Generated Image is Copyrightable in Split with United States Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
10
2023
Will Supreme Court Consider Whether to Allow an Alternative to In-App Purchasing on the App Store? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
14
2023
Federal Circuit Vacates District Court’s Claim Construction of the Term “Pipette Guiding Mechanism” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
23
2019
Don’t Spill Your Trade Secrets: Protecting Your Competitive Advantage in the Food and Beverage Industry (Part 2 of 2) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
22
2024
Identifying Protocols by Name May Disclose Sufficient Structure for Computer-Implemented Means-Plus-Function Limitations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
17
2013
Creditors’ Rights Clarified By Interpretation II of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the People’s Republic of China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2019
Italian Film Composer “Scores” for Authors Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
19
2024
Mind Your Audience: Disclosure of Confidential Information to AI Programs Can Give Rise to Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
3
2024
FTC’s Campaign Against Improper Orange Book Listings Continues with Amicus Brief in Teva’s Challenge of Amneal Asthma Inhaler ANDA Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
5
2020
Intellectual Property Outlook: Cases and Trends to Follow in 2020 — PART 3 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
8
2020
Breach of FRAND Implications on ITC Exclusion Orders In View of the Public’s Interest Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
15
2016
Federal Circuit is In Sync with Patent’s Validity Under Section 101 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
22
2020
USPTO Announces a New Initiative to Provide Applicants Additional Time to Petition for Restoring a Right of Priority or Benefit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
31
2009
Joseph Abboud Is Back: Personal Name Trademark Controversy Continues Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
25
2010
Smells Like Trademark Protection: Copycat Perfumes Cannot Engage in Comparative Advertising, on Odor of the Court in the UK and EU Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
18
2011
Tweet Me! - The Southern District of New York Answers Copyright Questions Raised By Twitter and Twitpic Use Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
3
2022
SEC Targets NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
31
2011
Increasing Level of Seizures by U.S. Customs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
21
2011
Court Denies Louboutin Preliminary Injunction: Holds Fashion Blind to Single Color Marks Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
13
2015
Rogue Witnesses (Silicon Valley, Episode 17) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
27
2022
One Bad Apple Won’t Spoil the Rest of the Bunch’s Ability to Fairly Compete in Matthews International Corp. v. Lombardi Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2023
To Be, or Not to Be? Considerations for A.I.- Generated Art Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2013
BONDing WITH NPE's - The Requirement for Security for Costs or Expenses Under Section 1030 of the California Code of Civil Procedure Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
3
2019
Challenges in Filing Successful IPR Petitions for Video Game Patents Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins