Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Dec
14
2023
PTAB’s Decision of a Singular-Only Construction of the Term “The Sample Stream” Reversed Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
18
2016
Federal Circuit Reaffirms Its Longstanding Patent Exhaustion Precedents in Lexmark. v. Impression Products (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2016) (en banc) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
27
2014
Are Circuit Courts of Appeal Split as to the Preclusive Impact Accorded to Prior Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
20
2014
FTC (Federal Trade Commission) Targets Reporting of Licensing of Pharmaceutical Patents With Special Rules for Premerger Notification: What You Need to Know Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
21
2020
Ninth Circuit Applies the “Continued Use” Doctrine to the Defend Trade Secrets Act Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
18
2021
Special Considerations in Video Game M&A Transactions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
29
2014
Data Rights Redux – 10 Ways to Preserve Your Intellectual Property Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
23
2014
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Clarifies “Patent Eligible Subject” Matter in its Recent Guidance in Light of Alice Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
30
2009
What Is the Jurisdictional Pre-Requisite for Copyright Litigation?: Do Denim v. Fried Denim Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
22
2010
China's Supreme People's Court Publishes White Paper on Intellectual Property Protection by Chinese Courts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
24
2022
USPTO’s Pilot Program for Deferring Subject Matter Eligibility Response Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
15
2011
Patent Reform: Key Features of the Senate and House Bills Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
1
2022
Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Information under China’s Cybersecurity Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
21
2011
About Face: Lancôme's Airbrushed Makeup Ads Banned in the UK Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
30
2018
Contractors Beware: The 2018 NDAA Ushers In New Changes Affecting IP Rights Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
11
2022
Key Rules and Cases for Patent Practitioners Working on AI Patent Applications Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
30
2015
In re Allegiance Staffing – Rare “Any Other Established Fact” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
31
2023
UCB, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. No. 2021-1924, (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
2
2013
Federal Jury Finds Executive Recruiter Guilty Stealing Trade Secrets From Former Employer In Order to Start Competing Business Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
4
2023
FS.COM INC. v. International Trade Commission Corning Optical Communications LLC – Intervenor No. 22-1228 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
21
2019
Federal Circuit Weighs in on Patent Subject-Matter Eligibility of Dietary Supplements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2013
An Unreasonable Royalty Rate is No Gaming Matter Re: Patent Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
13
2023
SEC Enforcements Against NFTs – Are You Next? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
11
2023
The March on Pharmaceutical Patents? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
8
2024
Nota Bene Episode 168: How Patent Disputes Affect the Semiconductor Industry [PODCAST] Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
19
2013
Chinese Acquisition of US Technology: Export Regulation and Foreign Investment Issue Spotting Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
28
2024
Federal Circuit Weighs in on Temporal Rigidity of the Baye-Dole Act’s Licensing Provisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
12
2020
Machine Learning Patentability in 2019: 5 Cases Analyzed and Lessons Learned Part 4 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins