February 5, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 36

Error message

  • Warning: Undefined variable $settings in include_once() (line 135 of /var/www/html/docroot/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in include_once() (line 135 of /var/www/html/docroot/sites/default/settings.php).

February 03, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 02, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

New Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions on Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from China, India, Korea, Taiwan and Vietnam

Today, DAK Americas LLC; Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America; and Auriga Polymers Inc. (Petitioners) filed antidumping (AD) petitions on fine denier polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF) from China, India, Korea, Taiwan, and Vietnam. The petitioners also filed countervailing duty (CVD) petitions on fine denier PSF from China and India.

The U.S. AD law imposes special tariffs to counteract imports that are sold in the United States at less than “normal value.” The U.S. CVD law imposes special tariffs to counteract imports that are sold in the United States with the benefit of foreign government subsidies. For AD/CVD duties to be imposed, the U.S. government must determine not only that dumping and/or subsidies are occurring, but also that there is “material injury” (or threat thereof) by reason of the dumped and/or subsidized imports. Importers are liable for any potential AD/CVD duties imposed. In addition, these investigations could impact purchasers by increasing prices and/or decreasing supply of fine denier PSF.

Please note, public versions of some of the petitions have not yet been made available. Please let us know if you would like further information regarding country-specific details, such as alleged dumping margins, or subsidy programs alleged.


The merchandise covered by these petitions is described as follows:

The merchandise subject to this proceeding is synthetic staple fibers, not carded, combed or otherwise processed for spinning, nonwoven and other uses, of polyesters measuring less than 3.3 decitex (3 denier) in diameter. The subject merchandise may be coated, usually with a finish, or not coated. Subject fine denier polyester staple fiber (“fine denier PSF”) is generally used for yam spinning for woven and knit applications to produce textile and apparel products, for non-woven applications to produce wipes, medical/hygiene products, and other personal care items, and for other end uses.

The following products are excluded from the scope: (1) PSF equal to or greater than 3.3 decitex (more than 3 denier, inclusive) currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) at subheadings 5503.20.0045 and 5503.20.0065, which is often used in "fill" applications; and (2) low-melt PSF defined as a bi-component fiber with an outer, nonpolyester sheath that melts at a significantly lower temperature than its inner polyester core (classified at HTSUS 5503.20.0015).

Fine denier PSF is classifiable under the HTSUS subheading 5503.20.0025. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise under the orders is dispositive.

Estimated Schedule of Investigations:

  • May 31, 2017 – Petition is filed

  • June 20, 2017 – DOC initiates AD and CVD investigations

  • June 21, 2017 – ITC staff conference (estimated)

  • July 17, 2017 – Deadline for ITC preliminary injury determination

  • August 24, 2017 – Deadline for DOC preliminary CVD determinations, if deadlines are not postponed

  • October 30, 2017 – Deadline for DOC preliminary CVD determinations, if deadlines are fully postponed

  • November 7, 2017– Deadline for DOC preliminary AD determinations, if deadlines are not postponed

  • December 27, 2017 – Deadline for DOC preliminary AD determinations, if deadlines are fully postponed

  • May 11, 2018 – Deadline for DOC final AD/CVD determinations, if both preliminary and final AD determinations are fully postponed and the CVD deadlines are aligned with the AD investigations

  • June 25, 2018 – Deadline for ITC final injury determination, assuming fully postponed DOC deadlines

© 2023 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume VII, Number 151

About this Author

Douglass Heffner, International trade lawyer, Drinker Biddle

Douglas J. Heffner litigates customs and international trade matters including antidumping duty, countervailing duty and safeguard cases. He represents foreign companies in Canada, Europe, Japan and Mexico, as well as domestic producers in industries that range from high-tech to heavy industry, to consumer and industrial goods. He also represents trade associations, government agencies and embassies in a broad range of matters.

Richard P Ferrin, International Trade Lawyer, Drinker Biddle

Richard P. Ferrin advises clients about international trade regulations, particularly antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings at both the administrative and appellate levels. He advocates for his client in global “safeguards” proceedings and on customs matters involving classification issues and country-of-origin determinations. Richard has represented foreign manufacturers, foreign exporters, and U.S. importers in antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission, and in judicial review of...