June 16, 2019

June 14, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 13, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Significant Telehealth Expansion Proposed in Bipartisan Senate Bill

Earlier this month, a bipartisan group, led by U.S. Senator Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), introduced a bill in the Senate focused on promoting cost savings and quality care under the Medicare program through the use of telehealth and remote patient monitoring (RPM) services, and incentivizing such digital health technologies by expanding coverage for them under the Medicare program. The bill, Creating Opportunities Now for Necessary and Effective Care Technologies (CONNECT) for Health Act (S. 2484 and H.R. 4442), has received statements of support from over 50 organizations, including the American Medical Association, the American Heart Association, the American Telemedicine Association, the American Association of Retired Persons, Anthem, Intel and Kaiser Permanente.  An independent study suggests that the bill will save the government approximately $1.8 billion over a 10-year period.

Background on Medicare Coverage of Telehealth Services

Medicare has historically provided coverage for telehealth services in those instances where patients would otherwise be geographically distant from appropriate providers. Section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act provides that telehealth services are covered if the beneficiary is seen: (a) at an approved “originating site” (e.g., physician offices, hospitals, skilled nursing facilities) that is located within a rural Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) that is either outside of a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) or in a rural census tract, or a county outside of a MSA; (b) by an approved provider (e.g., physicians, nurse practitioners, clinical psychologists); (c) for a defined set of services, including consultations, office visits, pharmacological management, and individual and group diabetes self-management training services; and (d) using certain telecommunications technologies.

As discussed below, the CONNECT for Health Act removes certain barriers to Medicare coverage—which may encourage providers to increase the types of telehealth services provided to Medicare beneficiaries, including RPM services—and reflects the broader phenomenon of the gradual movement of digital health tools from the sidelines into every day care and a recognition that such tools are essential to achieving the goals of health reform.  Key aspects of the CONNECT for Health Act are summarized below:

Opportunities for Telehealth and RPM “Bridge” Demonstration Waivers and APM Participants

The bill creates a telehealth “bridge” demonstration program that provides waivers to eligible applicants (e.g., physicians, physician assistants, nurses, practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, nurse anesthetists and alternative payment model (APM) participants) who are furnishing telehealth or RPM services that are consistent with the goals of the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), including goals of quality, clinical practice improvement, resource utilization or the incentive payments for participation in eligible APMs.

If granted, the applicant will not be subject to certain restrictions applicable to other telehealth providers under section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act, including originating site restrictions, geographic limitations and any limitation on the type of provider who may furnish telehealth services.

To ensure compliance with the CONNECT for Health Act’s requirements, demonstration program participants must annually submit information requested by the Secretary of Health and Human Services for evaluation of the demonstration program, including information on utilization and expenditures for telehealth or remote patient monitoring services, and data regarding the preceding year’s quality measures. Additionally, demonstration program participants must submit to random audits of claims to ensure that waivers are being used as intended. (Qualifying APM participants will not need to participate in such audits.)

Notably, the bill does not address whether payment for these services will be determined by the physician fee schedule or some other schedule to be created by Secretary Burwell.

Expansion of RPM Services for Individuals with Chronic Conditions and Recent Hospitalizations

Medicare currently does not reimburse for RPM services. The CONNECT for Health Act proposes to provide reimbursement for RPM services for certain patients with chronic conditions (i.e., patients with two or more covered chronic conditions and a history of two or more hospitalization or emergency room visits related to covered chronic conditions in the preceding 12 months). Rural health clinics and federally qualified health centers are named in the bill as eligible providers of RPM services for such patients.

Notably, the bill separately defines telehealth and RPM, the effect of which is to exempt RPM services from the current Medicare restrictions applicable to the coverage of telehealth services.  However, the bill includes its own set of restrictions on coverage for RPM services, such as limiting its use to the treatment of patients with chronic conditions (as defined above).

Stroke Evaluation Sites and Native American Health Service Facilities as Sites Eligible for Telehealth Reimbursement

Medicare reimbursement for telehealth services is currently limited to a narrow list of originating sites in specific geographic areas. Under the bill, any site (without geographic restriction) may serve as the originating site for purposes of acute stroke evaluation or management. However, eliminating the originating site restrictions may have limited effect due to the fact that the most common current procedural terminology (CPT) codes used for stroke (99291 and 99292) are currently not reimbursable telehealth codes, and the CONNECT for Health Act does not address the need for additional CPT codes for the treatment of acute stroke.

In addition, the bill permits any site to be reimbursed if it is a facility of the Indian Health Service authorized under the Native Hawaiian Health Care Improvement Act, regardless of geography.

The bill excludes newly permitted originating sites from receiving the facility fee paid to originating sights under section 1834(m)(2)(B) of the Social Security Act.

Medicare Advantage Changes

The CONNECT for Health Act proposes changes to Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, such that an MA plan may elect to use telehealth or RPM services to provide benefits under the original Medicare fee-for-service program option, including items or services furnished to treat medical or behavioral health conditions. The MA plan will not be subject to certain restrictions under section 1834(m) of the Social Security Act, including originating site restrictions, geographic limitations and any limitation on the type of provider who may furnish telehealth services.

The bill requires MA plans that elect to provide telehealth services to enrollees to annually submit data on expenditures and utilization.

© 2019 McDermott Will & Emery


About this Author

Jennifer S. Geetter, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Attorney

Jennifer S. Geetter is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm's Washington, D.C., office.  She focuses her practice on emerging biotechnology and safety issues, advising hospital, industry, insurance and provider clients on matters relating to research, drug and device development, off-label use, personalized medicine, formulary compliance, privacy and security, electronic health records and data strategy initiatives, patient safety, conflicts of interest, scientific review and research misconduct, internal hospital disciplinary proceedings,...

202 756 8205

Marshall E. Jackson, Jr. is an associate in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Washington, D.C. office.  Marshall focuses his practice on transactional and corporate matters affecting health care organizations,  including business organization, corporate governance, mergers and acquisitions, strategic affiliations and joint ventures.  Marshall also provides advice and counsel on a full range of federal and state fraud and abuse laws to hospital systems, medical practice groups and pharmacies.

Prior to joining McDermott, Marshall was an associate in the health care and life sciences practice group of a national law firm.  Marshall graduated with a health law concentration from the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law, and he was recognized as a member of the Order of the Barristers.  During law school, he served as senior articles editor of the Journal of Healthcare Law and Policy and captain of Maryland's National Trial Team.

Lisa Schmitz Mazur, Health Law Attorney, McDermott Will Law Firm

Lisa Schmitz Mazur is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Chicago office.  Lisa maintains a general health industry practice, focusing on the representation of hospitals and health systems and other health industry providers.

Lisa’s representation of hospitals and health systems includes providing guidance on not-for-profit corporate governance matters, tax-exemption issues, conflict of interest compliance and overall corporate compliance effectiveness.  In addition, Lisa regularly assists hospital and health system clients to...

Dale Van Demark, health care, attorney, McDermott Will, law firm

Dale C. Van Demark is a partner in the law firm of McDermott Will & Emery LLP and is based in the Firm’s Washington, D.C., office.  He focuses his practice on a broad array of merger, acquisition, investment, and strategic structuring transactions, with clients in the health industry. He has extensive experience in health system affiliation and restructuring transactions and regularly represents for-profit and tax-exempt clients in a variety of transactions, including strategic transactions with physicians and hospitals. He regularly advises clients regarding the opportunities...