September 18, 2019

September 18, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 17, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 16, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Someone's Watching Your Auto-Enrollment Program

“Auto enrollment” or “negative option” programs as they sometimes are called are very popular for many online services and mobile apps. Such programs often involve a free-trial period for a subscription or other electronic service. The consumer then becomes charged for the ongoing service if he/she doesn’t cancel before the end of the trial period.

A recent action by the FTC emphasizes the need for any company using auto-enrollment programs to be careful in how the program is structured and to ensure that the full terms are disclosed clearly and conspicuously to consumers.

The FTC action involved an online dating service. The service allowed free use of the site with limited access to information about other members. It also offered a fuller service (for a fee) to gain access to more information about other members. 

The FTC action alleged that the site (a) tricked free members into signing up for the full subscription service by sending enticing messages about non-existent members attractive to the free members, and (b) then placed the new subscribers into an auto-renewal program, charging them for additional subscription periods without obtaining consent or adequately disclosing the auto-renewal feature. Moreover, even when users tried to cancel their accounts, the FTC alleges that the site often ignored the requests or questioned the reasons for cancelling while continuing to bill the consumer. The case ultimately was settled with payment of a fine of $616,165, plus a promise to correct the allegedly offending business practices.

While the dating-site case involved some allegedly egregious facts, the moral of the story applies to any company using auto-enrollment or auto-renewal programs:  

  • Disclose all material terms of the offer clearly and conspicuously.

  • Obtain unambiguous, affirmative consent from the consumer before any billing.

  • Remind the consumer prior to any auto-renewal.

  • Provide an easy-to-use mechanism for the consumer to cancel/opt-out.

Given the recent attention to negative option programs, companies should take care to comply with FTC and state requirements. For additional background on federal and state regulation of negative option and auto-enrollment programs, see our recent GT Client Advisory.

©2019 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Ed Chansky, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, Las Vegas, Intellectual Property Law Attorney
Shareholder

Ed Chansky focuses his practice in the areas of intellectual property (particularly development, selection, protection and licensing of trademarks worldwide) and advertising, sales promotion, and trade-regulation law, including charitable promotions, cause-related marketing, sweepstakes, contests, gift cards, eCommerce, substantiation of advertising claims, social gaming, social media, and all aspects of unfair or deceptive trade practices in a wide variety of industries.

A trusted advisor to many national companies, Ed is a frequent speaker at...

702-599-8016
Erica Okerberg, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, Las Vegas, Corporate and Gaming Law Attorney
Associate

Erica L. Okerberg focuses her practice on gaming law, including licensing and regulatory work; and promotional law, including sweepstakes and social gaming. Erica's experience includes: preparing and coordinating gaming applications and gaming renewals for individuals and entities in the U.S. and international jurisdictions; representing clients during the preparation and adoption of Nevada gaming regulations; preparing materials for sweepstakes, contests, and other promotional offers; as well as counseling clients regarding social gaming and skill games.

702-599-8073