May 22, 2022

Volume XII, Number 142


May 20, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

South Carolina Expected to Implement Liability Shield Law to Protect Businesses From Certain COVID-19–Related Claims

The “South Carolina COVID-19 Liability Immunity Act” (Senate Bill 147) is expected to reach Governor Henry McMaster’s desk early this week for his signature. Senate sponsors initially introduced the act on December 9, 2020, and it received final approval in the House of Representatives on April 23, 2021. Similar to its previously introduced predecessors, House Bill 5527 and Senate Bill 1259, the act provides liability protections against coronavirus-based claims for a limited time period for businesses that follow public health guidance in response to the coronavirus public health emergency.

Specifically, the act protects a broad class of “covered entities” and “covered individuals” from “coronavirus claims,” which include “any claim or cause of action arising from”:

(a) an actual, alleged, or feared exposure to or contraction of coronavirus:

         (i) from the premises of a covered entity;

(ii) from the operations, products, or services provided on‑premises or off-premises for a covered entity; or

(iii) from the acts or omissions of a covered individual or covered entity, to include the delay or withholding of medical care for the treatment or diagnosis of the coronavirus;

(b)(i) the prescribing or dispensing of medicines for off-label use to attempt to combat the coronavirus;

(ii) the providing of health care services related to the coronavirus that are outside of a provider’s professional scope of practice; or

(iii) the utilizing of equipment or supplies to combat or treat the coronavirus in a manner outside of the equipment or supplies’ normal use in medical practice or in the provision of health care services; or

(c) the manufacturing or donating of precautionary equipment or supplies, including personal protective equipment, due to shortages that occurred during the coronavirus pandemic.

To receive immunity under the act, a covered entity or covered individual must “reasonably adhere[] to public health guidance applicable at the time the conduct giving rise to a coronavirus claim occurs.” The act defines “public health guidance” as “any applicable published guidance, directive, order, or rule provided by the South Carolina Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, or another state governmental entity, and federal guidance if referenced by state entities, that is applicable to the type of covered entity or covered individual at issue and to the coronavirus claim at issue.”

The immunity defense does not apply to claims arising under Section 3(1)(b), “if a claimant proves by a preponderance of the evidence that the covered entity or covered individual caused the injury or damage by: (a) grossly negligent, reckless, willful, or intentional misconduct; or (b) a failure to make any attempt to adhere to public health guidance.” For all other claims, the immunity will not apply “if the claimant proves by clear and convincing evidence that the covered entity or covered individual caused the injury or damage by: (a) grossly negligent, reckless, willful, or intentional misconduct; or (b) a failure to make any attempt to adhere to public health guidance.”

A majority of states have pending legislation or already have implemented temporary liability protections for employers.  While these laws vary from state to state, the common theme is to protect employers and businesses from tort liability if they comply with applicable safety guidance.

Upon the governor’s approval, the act’s provisions would “apply to all civil and administrative causes of action that arise between March 13, 2020, and June 30, 2021, or [180] days after the final state of emergency is lifted for COVID-19 in [South Carolina], whichever is later, and that are based upon facts occurring during this time period.”

In anticipation of the passage of the act, employers may want to keep current on and follow all applicable public health guidance for safe operation during the COVID-19 pandemic. A documented record of following official recommended practices may help employers affirmatively demonstrate compliance with public health guidance and help defend against allegations of heightened negligence.

© 2022, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 118

About this Author

Phillip A. Kilgore Employment Litigation Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart Greenville, SC
Office Managing Shareholder

Phillip Kilgore has been in the practice of litigation and labor and employment law in the Greenville office of Ogletree Deakins since 1986.

Phillip has extensive litigation experience, representing clients in state and federal courts and administrative tribunals. He has handled a wide range of cases from traditional employment discrimination claims to tort claims and from environmental claims to shareholder derivative actions and minority shareholder disputes.

Phillip also is an expert in advising clients on the protection of business assets and litigating acts of...

S. Michael Nail Employment Litigation Attorney Ogletree Deakins Greenville, SC

Michael embraces challenges and enjoys assisting clients navigate unique legal issues. Michael represents employers in a variety of labor & employment litigation, including suits under Title VII, the ADA, the ADEA, the FLSA, and other anti-discrimination laws and employment-related torts. Michael also counsels managers and human resources professionals on day-to-day employment matters. Michael also maintains a niche practice by defending the interests of clients in all aspects of workers’ compensation claims before the South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commission.

In addition...