July 2, 2022

Volume XII, Number 183

Advertisement
Advertisement

July 01, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 30, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 29, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

TCPA Regulatory Update — FCC Announces New State-Federal Partnerships to Combat Robocalls

In February, Federal Communications Commission Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel announced the addition of Colorado, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Vermont to the Commission’s list of robocalling investigatory partners, bringing the total number of states to 16. In addition, she announced the execution of two Memoranda of Understanding (“MOUs”) between the state attorneys general of Colorado and Vermont and the Commission’s Enforcement Bureau. The MOUs facilitate the Commission’s goal of increasing collaboration between the Enforcement Bureau and all U.S. states and territories on robocalling mitigation efforts. Signing MOUs helps the Commission, as well as state attorneys general, build cases against robocallers by allowing the parties to share information necessary to build a record, interview targets, and review complaints. Further, the MOUs help safeguard against duplicative efforts during investigations where both a state and the FCC’s Enforcement Bureau may be pursuing the same entity or individual. The news release notes that the Commission and eight state attorneys general cooperated in an investigation of a telemarketer who made nearly one billion illegal calls. The combined investigation resulted in the largest fine in FCC history, and a separate lawsuit against the target was filed in Texas.

In making the announcement, Chairwoman Rosenworcel reiterated the FCC’s commitment to stopping unlawful robocalls and helping protect consumers. However, the agency can, stating that “[p]rotecting consumers from robocall and spoofing scams is an everyday challenge for local, state, and federal law enforcement. By sharing information and closely cooperating on investigations, we can better protect consumers everywhere.” The Chairwoman further noted that the FCC’s enforcement partnerships “have already paid dividends, and I know these new agreements will only further that success.”

©1994-2022 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 81
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Russell H. Fox, Communications Attorney, Mintz Levin, Regulatory Approvals
Member

With over 35 years in the wireless telecommunications industry, Russell is among the most experienced wireless communications attorneys in the country. Unique among his peers, Russell assists clients on federal legislative, regulatory, and transactional matters. He analyzes legislation on behalf of clients, participates in proceedings before the FCC and other federal agencies, negotiates spectrum agreements, and represents wireless providers in spectrum auctions. He is also frequently consulted on matters involving US spectrum use and policy.

Whether they are in the middle of a...

202-434-7483
Jonathan P. Garvin Communications & Media Attorney Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo Washington, DC
Associate

Jon focuses his practice on a wide range of legal challenges facing companies in the communications and media industries. He regularly advises clients on transactional, regulatory, and compliance issues before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) involving wireless, broadband, broadcast, and cable matters. In addition, Jon advises broadcast and print media clients on FTC and state-specific advertising rules and advises broadcast companies on Television Spectrum Repack and FCC license requirements. 

Jon brings FCC experience and insight to his engagements with the firm’s...

202-434-7357
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement