December 3, 2020

Volume X, Number 338


December 03, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 02, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 01, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

November 30, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

U.S. to Terminate India and Turkey’s GSP Eligibility

On March 4, 2019, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) announced that the United States would terminate India and Turkey’s designations as beneficiary countries under the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) program. GSP is a unilateral duty preference program detailed in General Note 4 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States that allows for duty free entry for qualifying merchandise from designated developing countries.

President Trump issued letters to Congress regarding his intent to terminate GSP treatment for India and Turkey. Absent some intervening action, GSP status for these countries will be eliminated 60 days after the President notifies Congress and the impacted country of the United States’ intent to end the country’s GSP eligibility. Therefore, both India and Turkey’s GSP eligibility are currently set to expire on May 3, 2019.

The United States allows for duty free importation of certain imports from GSP designated beneficiary countries so long as those countries comply with, among other things, certain market access criteria and otherwise meet GSP qualification requirements (i.e., product was substantially transformed in the GSP country, local content requirements have been met, and the product is shipped direct to the U.S.). Further, the GSP beneficiary country must assure the United States that it will refrain from engaging in unreasonable export practices.

USTR previously announced, on April 12, 2018, that it would review India’s GSP eligibility. USTR stated that the review was based on concerns regarding India’s compliance with the GSP’s market access criterion. This was a self-initiated review by USTR, but it accepted petitions filed by the U.S. dairy industry and the medical device industry given the alleged Indian trade barriers affecting U.S. exports for those industries.

The letter to Congress commencing the process to terminate India’s GSP benefits did not provide details regarding USTR’s findings, and merely stated that “India has not assured the United States that it will provide equitable and reasonable access to the markets of India ….” This determination follows several months of negotiations between USTR and its Indian counterparts. President Trump’s letter to Congress regarding the termination of Turkey’s GSP status, however, was reportedly due to Turkey’s economic growth since its designation as a GSP beneficiary in 1975. USTR determined that such a move was necessitated by Turkey’s higher level of economic development as evidenced by “an increase in Gross National Income per capita, declining poverty rates, and export diversification, by trading partner and sector.”

President Trump’s letter to Congress also stated that Turkey has “graduated from other developed countries’ GSP programs due to its increase in economic development or through reciprocal arrangements.”

© 2020 Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 65



About this Author

Kathleen Murphy, International trade Lawyer, Drinker Biddle

Kathleen M. Murphy counsels clients on maximizing trade benefits, making informed global procurement decisions and developing domestic and international trade compliance programs. She represents clients in duty-recovery initiatives and customs challenges concerning tariff classification, valuation, Free Trade Agreements and country of origin determinations, among other areas. She guides clients through compliance audits and validations, as well as penalty investigations conducted by U.S. or foreign customs authorities. She also represents clients in...

William Rucker, Drinker Biddle Law Firm, International Trade and Customs Specialist

William R. “Randy” Rucker assists clients with all aspects of U.S. Customs law, including the classification and valuation of merchandise, country of origin and marking determinations, quantitative import restraints, duty-preference and savings programs, understanding and receiving the benefits of free trade agreements, compliance audits, enforcement actions and other trade-related matters.

In order to assist clients with their compliance efforts and satisfy "reasonable care" requirements, Randy frequently performs reviews of companies' internal...

James Sawyer Trade Attorney Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath Chicago, IL

James Sawyer counsels clients on critical import compliance issues and duty-savings opportunities, balancing business realities with effective internal control processes to meet importers’ legal obligations. He advises in all areas of U.S. import law and regulation, including tariff classification, valuation, origin determination and marking, free trade agreements and duty preference programs, and enforcement. James is a co-leader of Faegre Drinker's Chicago team.

Import Compliance Counsel

James frequently counsels clients on strategic sourcing and import compliance issues...

Luke Karamyali, Drinker Biddle Law Firm, Chicago, International Trade Law Attorney

Luke J. Karamyalil assists his clients in all aspects of international trade laws and regulations, including import and export compliance. He also assists clients in ensuring their internal processes meet Customs’ “reasonable care” standard. Luke has experience helping clients navigate specific trade laws and regulations, including those that arise under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, the Trade Adjustment Assistance Program, anti-boycott compliance, Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence (FOCI) mitigation, and anti-dumping and countervailing duties.