September 24, 2021

Volume XI, Number 267

Advertisement

September 24, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 23, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 22, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Virginia Pipeline Ruling Could Have a Significant Impact on the Fight for Environmental Justice

A dispute over the proposed extension of a natural gas pipeline project lies at the forefront of this fight.

The Lambert compressor station, a natural gas facility in rural Virginia, if approved, would extend the 303-mile Mountain Valley pipeline project by 75 miles into North Carolina. Opponents of the project argue that the proposed expansion would adversely impact the health of low-income and majority African-American residents of Banister District in Pittsylvania County, Virginia. These arguments are being made in front of the Virginia Air Pollution Control Board in an effort to obtain a denial of a key approval being sought by the developers of the project.

Analysts believe that a denial would be a big step in the fight for environmental justice. This begs the question: what is environmental justice? According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, environmental justice is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations and policies.[1]

Political, legal and societal pressures are creating debates around pipeline projects throughout the country, the most notable of them being the Keystone XL oil conduit to the Atlantic Coast. Developers are revising or, in some cases, abandoning mature natural gas projects due to these pressures and strong advocacy and activism in favor of environmental justice. Recently, for example, the developers of the Byhalia Connection crude oil pipeline in Memphis walked away from the project due to upheaval over the proposed project’s disparagingly adverse impact on African-American neighborhoods.[2] Grassroots activism, voices as powerful as the President’s[3] and as well-respected as George Thurston’s, a New York University expert on the health effects caused by air pollution, have made clear to natural gas pipeline developers that environmental justice is to be taken seriously.

These efforts have not only spurred cancellations or terminations of significant energy projects. They have also led to the creation of projects, ventures and initiatives that further environmental justice, especially in the renewable energy sector. Earlier this month, for instance, Microsoft announced a partnership with Volt Energy, a national minority-owned solar development firm, pursuant to which Volt will supply Microsoft with 250 MW of utility-scale solar energy. Volt and Microsoft both pledged to invest a portion of the revenue derived from this partnership in underserved minority communities.[4]

Virginia’s Air Pollution Control Board has a big decision to make. Last year, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a different project, the Atlantic Coast pipeline project, could not go ahead[5]. The Court held that this same Board had failed to carefully account for the disproportionate harm of the project to surrounding residents.[6] The Board now has to decide: will the Lambert project live or will the possibly emerging trend in favor of environmental justice see the project suffer the same fate of some other pipeline projects of recent times? This case could prove to be a bellwether in the larger national environmental justice debate.


[1] Learn About Environmental Justice | US EPA

[2] POLITICO Pro Article 

[3] President Biden's Environmental Justice Plan

[4] Microsoft Enters 250-MW Solar Power PPA with Volt Energy

[5] Home - Atlantic Coast Pipeline 

[6] POLITICO Pro Article

Copyright ©2021 Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLPNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 208
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Weston Adams III Attorney Energy Industry Group Nelson Mullins Columbia
Partner

Weston co-chairs the Energy Industry Group and practices energy, environmental, and appellate law.

Experience

  • Acted as lead counsel in three avoided cost trials on solar energy pricing and standard contract terms at the South Carolina Public Service Commission.

  • Served as lead counsel on more than 100 appeals to the South Carolina Supreme Court, the South Carolina Court of Appeals, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.

  • ...
803-255-9708
Lawrence L. Ostema Attorney Energy Industry Group Nelson Mullins Charlotte
Partner

Larry Ostema co-chairs the Energy Industry Group.

He has served as counsel in a range of domestic and international project and corporate financings and mergers and acquisitions in the energy, telecom, high-technology, and manufacturing industries. He has represented start-up, emerging growth, and public companies in venture capital and project financing, fund formation, technology transfer, mergers and acquisitions, strategic alliances, management buyouts, and securities offerings.

His energy and infrastructure...

704-417-3124
Franco Furmanski Attorney Mergers Acquisitions Nelson Mullins Miami
Associate

Franco focuses on representing companies and their principals in connection with mergers, acquisitions, joint ventures, financings, strategic investments, corporate restructuring, and general corporate matters. He also assists clients with various kinds of commercial agreements such as licensing, distribution, services, employment, and real estate lease agreements. His clients operate in various industries, including energy, manufacturing, healthcare, and sports and entertainment. Franco assists both domestic and international clients and is fluent in Spanish. 

305-373-9429
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement