Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Feb
20
2023
Mandatory Arbitration Lives on in California: Ninth Circuit Strikes Down AB 51 Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
10
2023
Sanderling Management v. Snap Inc. No. 21-2173 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) Alice – 35 U.S.C. § 101 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
3
2014
Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC, Decision on Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review Faegre Drinker
Aug
24
2015
Delaware Judges Are Finding Patent Claims Indefinite Post-Nautilus Foley & Lardner LLP
May
16
2016
Supreme Court Issues Decision in Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins Faegre Drinker
Nov
3
2016
Second Circuit Seeks Guidance from NY Court of Appeals on Standard for Awarding Punitive Damages Under New York City Human Rights Law Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
20
2017
A Tie Too Far: Antitrust Class Action Alleging Physician Association Tied Board Certification to Association Membership Survives Motion to Dismiss Mintz
Aug
24
2020
As Hair Discrimination Bans Grow, New York City Seeks Public Comment on Proposed Rule Faegre Drinker
Jan
27
2021
Court Rejects CCPA As Basis for Limiting Scope of Discovery in Litigation Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
7
2022
IPR Jeopardy: Estoppel Pitfalls for Multiple Concurrently Filed Petitions Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
9
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 9, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
4
2014
Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd.: Denying Motion for Additional Pages for Petitioner Reply Faegre Drinker
Jun
25
2015
Supreme Court Affirms Ban on Patent Royalties After Patent Expiration Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
5
2017
DC Circuit Opts Out of Flawed FCC Ruling Vedder Price
Oct
29
2020
Hallmark Win in Greeting Card Trademark Dispute: Court Finds Unauthorized Sale of Cards Meant for Destruction Infringing Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
25
2021
Driverless Car Accidents – Who’s at Fault? Clifford Law Offices
Dec
1
2021
Legal Status of Vaccine Mandates Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
10
2022
Payment Confirmation Establishes Filing Date in IPR Petitions Finnegan
Nov
7
2022
CIPA SUNDAY: California Court Rules No Personal Jurisdiction Where Out of State Defendant’s Conduct Was Not Expressly Aimed at Forum State Troutman Amin, LLP
May
23
2024
Court Denies Policyholder’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in RWI Lawsuit Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
13
2011
Why Companies Want Arbitrators Who Have A Public Profile On LinkedIn And The Internet Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
25
2012
Intellectually Disabled Workers Awarded $1.3M for Pay Discrimination by Henry's Turkey Service U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Sep
23
2013
EU Court Strikes Down Iran Asset Freeze Sanctions: Council of the European Union Urged to Act with more Rigour McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
11
2014
FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Declines Courts’ Requests to Define “Natural” with respect to GMO (Genetically-Modified Organisms) Foods Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
9
2014
Federal Circuit Finds that Public Interest Group Lacks Standing to Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decision Armstrong Teasdale
May
29
2019
Testing Adequacy and Typicality: California Federal Court Restricts TCPA Defendant’s Ability to Examine Serial Plaintiff’s Sources of Income. Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
3
2021
The U.S. Supreme Court Narrowly Construes the Definition of an ATDS (or Autodialer) under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Aug
31
2021
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Allows Enforcement to Require Removal of Unauthorized Wetlands Fill for Three Years After Each New Property Transfer Greenberg Traurig, LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins