Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Nov
1
2016
Direct-Indirect Test Eliminated by Seventh Circuit re: Employment Discrimination Heyl, Royster, Voelker & Allen, P.C.
Dec
5
2017
But I Didn’t DO Anything – – Passive Conduct and the Automatic Stay Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
11
2018
Vermont House of Representatives to Consider Pair of Sweeping Toxic Tort Liability Bills Beveridge & Diamond PC
Aug
6
2018
Admission Binding: Court Refuses to Allow TCPA Plaintiff to Change his Consent Tale at Trial Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
28
2020
TCPA Quick Hitter: Court Holds Counterclaim Seeking to Recover Debt in TCPA Suit May Proceed Troutman Amin, LLP
Jun
23
2021
Colorado Supreme Court Holds ‘Use-It-Or-Lose-It’ Vacation Policies Are Void in Nieto v. Clark’s Market Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
May
11
2022
New York Court Narrowly Interprets “Expected or Intended Injury” Exclusion in Win for Policyholder Hunton Andrews Kurth
Nov
4
2022
In Re Grand Jury: Supreme Court to Consider Attorney-Client Privilege in “Dual-Purpose Communications” K&L Gates
Feb
22
2023
The Commercial Division Rejects Yet Another Insured’s Claim for Coverage for Covid-Related Revenues Losses Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
13
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 13, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
19
2015
Complaint Issued by NLRB’s Acting General Counsel was Unauthorized, D.C. Appeals Court Rules Jackson Lewis P.C.
Aug
20
2016
Colleges and Universities Targeted in Class Action Lawsuits over Operation of Retirement Plans Armstrong Teasdale
Aug
31
2017
As Flu Shot Season Approaches, Inflexible Rules Can Cause Accommodation Headaches Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
22
2018
Patent Exhaustion Defense Unavailable to Reseller after Impression Products Mintz
Apr
10
2019
Collateral Estoppel Bars Assertion of Patent Claims That Do Not “Materially Alter the Question of Invalidity” Relative to Claims Invalidated in IPR Proceedings Mintz
Sep
27
2019
Non-Party Notice of Appeal in Reinsurance Dispute Results in an Award of Attorney Fees Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
1
2021
Set Phase to Subject Matter Ineligible: More Accurate Haplotype Phase Method Still Abstract McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
14
2022
Court Reversed Summary Judgment Against Trustee Where Beneficiary’s Affidavit Evidence Was Conclusory Winstead
Jul
26
2022
Court: OTC Company Has The Capacity To Protect Its Own Interests Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Feb
29
2024
I Hear Ya: Claim Terms Not as Narrow as Features in Specification McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2014
When Will D.C. Sick and Safe Leave Act Amendments Apply? Jackson Lewis P.C.
May
12
2016
Pennsylvania Employee Proceeds With Invasion of Privacy Claim Arising Out Of Positive Drug Test Result Jackson Lewis P.C.
May
5
2020
3M Takes Action to Protect Its Brand from Price Gouging And Trademark Infringement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
24
2020
“Oh, We Were Just Leaving!”: California Court Halts Order Requiring Uber and Lyft to Reclassify Drivers Proskauer Rose LLP
Nov
30
2021
Breaking News: Limited Three-State Preliminary Injunction of the Federal Contractor Vaccine Mandate Issued Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Dec
4
2023
Ohio PFAS Lawsuit Settled For $100 Million CMBG3 Law
Feb
21
2013
Judgment Against AutoZone Affirmed in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Disability Discrimination Case U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Jun
5
2014
Distinctive Developments, Ltd. v. Uniloc USA, Inc., Denying Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Reply Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins