Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Apr
27
2017
Amgen v. Sandoz: The Supreme Court’s First Tussle with the BPCIA Mintz
Sep
27
2017
“In Light of the Specification”: Federal Circuit Weighs in on the Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Mintz
Sep
6
2018
Middle District of Florida Court Finds Predictive Dialers Not Subject to TCPA Unless They Randomly or Sequentially Generate Numbers–but Adopts Low Pleadings Standard in the Process Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
12
2019
Can the Mere Registration of Company Name Infringe? In the Case of BMW, Yes! K&L Gates
Jun
2
2020
Is FCRA the Next Notorious California Lemon Law?: 9 Separate Cases, in The Same District, Involving the Same Claims Against the Same Defendant, Represented by The Same Counsels… What Is Going On? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
2
2021
Banned from TCPA Litigation For Life?: Court Refuses to Enforce Purported Ban on TCPA Claims by Repeat TCPA Player—But Suggests the Dream Might be Achievable Troutman Amin, LLP
Jun
30
2022
Supreme Court Limits EPA's Authority to Regulate Greenhouse Gas Emissions Van Ness Feldman LLP
Jun
12
2011
Joint (Direct) Infringement Still Requires Control … But Stay Tuned McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
21
2013
Recent SEC Settlements Serve as Cautionary Tale About the Use of Unregistered Broker-Dealers by Investment Advisers Hunton Andrews Kurth
May
1
2014
2014 Resolutions Series: Direct or Consequential? It Matters. Biotronik AG Reminds Us to Take Limitation of Liability Clauses Seriously Mintz
Jun
26
2014
Drafting Software Patent Applications to Meet Section 101 after the Alice Decision Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
14
2016
Illinois Appellate Court Rules Hospital Tax Exemption Law Unconstitutional Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
15
2017
‘Show Your Face’ – IBEW Restrictions On Union Resignation and Dues Checkoff In Right-to-Work States Found Unlawful Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
29
2020
Federal District Court Issues Nationwide Temporary Ban on Executive Order 13950 Faegre Drinker
Mar
7
2021
Second Circuit: Investment Advisor Not Covered by Plaintiff’s Employment Arbitration Agreement Jackson Lewis P.C.
Apr
8
2022
FTC Imposes Record-Setting $10M Fine Against Multistate Auto Dealer, Settling Charges of Racial Discrimination and Unauthorized Charges Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
26
2023
Federal Judge Enjoins Physician Gag Law Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Nov
1
2012
In the Spirit of DR Horton, ALJ Extends Protections to Job Applicants Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
3
2013
Dissenting Opinions in CLS Bank International v. Alice Corp. Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
4
2014
U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) Now Requires Satisfaction of the “Technical Prong” for Licensing-Based Domestic Industries: Certain Computers and Computer Peripheral Devices, and Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2015
PTAB to Purchasers: “Caveat Emptor” McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
13
2016
Merck’s Solvaldi® Patents Unenforceable for Egregious Misconduct Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
1
2016
Adjusting Wage Rates? Be Mindful of State Notice Requirements Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Mar
20
2018
HealthCare Investors Beware: U.S. Attorney Sues Private Equity Firm For Portfolio Company’s Alleged Billing Fraud Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Nov
15
2019
Look No Further Than the Insuring Clause: Ill-Gotten Gains Do Not Constitute Covered “Loss” Carlton Fields
Feb
3
2020
Who Gets To Decide Whether Class Arbitration Is Available? It Just Might Be The Arbitrator Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
5
2020
Federal Appeals Court Hands Down Important Ruling in Overtime Exemption Lawsuit Buckfire Law
Nov
3
2021
As the Battle over the Universata Acquisition Rages, the Chancery Court Finds that the Appropriate Standard of Review Regarding Actions of a Stockholders’ Representative is “Subjective Good Faith” K&L Gates
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins