Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization Sort descending
Mar
15
2023
SEC Seeks To Update Privacy Act of 1974 Regulations Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
6
2023
FDA Clarifies Approach to Pediatric Drug Development Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
27
2023
Yita LLC v. MacNeil IP LLC 2022-1373, 2022-1374 (Fed. Cir. June 6, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
27
2023
HIP Inc. v. Hormel Foods Corp. No. 2022-1696, _ F.4th ___ (Fed. Cir. May 2, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
8
2019
Supreme Court Holds that a Copyright Claimant May Commence an Infringement Suit Only AFTER the Copyright Office Registers the Copyright Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
8
2013
Dang v. San Francisco Forty Niners - Consumers Can Challenge Reebok's Exclusive NFL Apparel Deal Based Just on a Market of Garments Bearing NFL Team Logos Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
6
2023
Trinity Info Media, LLC, fka Trinity Intel Media, LLC, v. Covalent, Inc., No. 2022-1308 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2023) (“Opinion”) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
2
2013
Kraft v. Cracker Barrel: A Summary of Judge Posner’s Opinion and an Alternative Reverse Confusion Theory of Liability Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
7
2019
Today’s Special: Validity Goulash – Serving Up 101 in the Mechanical Arts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
25
2019
Blockchain Technology Continues to Support a Flourishing Music Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
5
2019
3 Steps in Furtherance of Avoiding Devastating Spoliation Sanctions in Trade Secret Misappropriation Litigation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
10
2024
M&A Transactions: Drafting AI Representations and Warranties for Non-AI Companies Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
3
2020
Intellectual Property Outlook: Cases and Trends to Follow in 2020 — PART 2 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
23
2014
Microsoft-Nokia: China’s MOFCOM (Ministry of Commerce) Quietly Slips Into the Debate about Injunctive Relief for FRAND (Fair, Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory)-Encumbered SEPs (Standard Essential Patents) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
12
2016
Compilation of Public Data Can be Trade Secret Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
5
2020
IP Protection and the Open COVID Cure Chase Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
16
2014
Conan Doyle’s Quixotic Attempt to Protect Sherlock Holmes Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
11
2020
Easier Copyright Registration Coming for Blogs and Social Media Posts Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
22
2020
Clash of Game Companies: Lessons learned from GREE and Supercell Dispute Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
29
2020
USPTO Issues Guidance on Examination of Generic.com Terms Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
29
2021
The DTSA as a Tool for Foreign Entities’ Enforcement of Trade Secrets: A New Legal Frontier Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
5
2017
Eleventh Circuit Joins Split Court Decisions on Registration Precondition for Copyright Suits Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2021
Is Lawful Possession of a Trade Secret Enough for Standing to Sue for Misappropriation? Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2009
Branded: Product Placement and Video Games Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2015
Those NDAs May Not Be Worth the Paper They Are Written On - Non-Disclosure Agreements Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
15
2021
Trade Secret Misappropriation: Denial of Motion for Attorneys’ Fees under CUTSA is Not an Appealable Order Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
25
2010
Sublicenses By Exclusive Licensees Of Copyrights - Copyright "Clarification" May Change The Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
9
2011
Patent Reform Is Again Before Congress - The Patent Reform Act of 2011 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
15
2011
March Madness Isn't for Everyone - Trademark Usage Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
15
2011
Federal Court Finds Allegations of "Bad Faith" in Sprinkler License Agreements to be "Vox Clamantis in Deserto" Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
27
2011
Anonymous Bloggers And The First Amendment: When And How Your Company Can Identify Its John Doe Defendants Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
2
2022
Money Laundering and High-Value Art: Treasury’s Study Discusses Financial Crimes and NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
14
2022
Tokenization and the Law: Legal Issues with NFTs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
30
2011
RIM Defeats Sherman Act Section 2 Claims At Pleading Stage Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
12
2023
Another Federal Agency Issues Request for Comments on AI Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins