Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
Jun
2
2015
Another Sequenom Patent Appeal Heads To The Federal Circuit Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
2
2015
International Business Machines v. Intellectual Ventures I: Granting Motion to Compel Testimony IPR2014-01385 Faegre Drinker
Jun
2
2015
Generic Top Level Domains - Current Sunrise Periods Open - April 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
2
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 2, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
2
2015
Allvoice Developments US v. Microsoft Corp. — Federal Circuit Finds Software Divorced From a System, Process or Article of Manufacture Not Patentable, as Expected Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
2
2015
Pacific Market Int’l v. Ignite USA: Excusing Late Filing IPR2014-00561,750 Faegre Drinker
Jun
2
2015
Generic Top Level Domains - Current Sunrise Periods Open - May 2015 Update Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
1
2015
Unprecedented Move: Vox Populi Extends Sunrise Deadline for “.sucks” Domain Registration Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
1
2015
Summary of Recent Precedential Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
1
2015
In Re Cipro: California Supreme Court's "Structured" Approach to Applying the Actavis Standard to State Antitrust Claims ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jun
1
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 1, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
1
2015
In Affirming a Preliminary Injunction Against Drug Companies, Second Circuit Finds Coercion in Product Hopping Scheme American University Washington College of Law
Jun
1
2015
Askeladden v. iSourceLoans: Denying Rehearing IPR2015-00134 Faegre Drinker
May
31
2015
Applicability of the Entire Market Value Rule in Hatch-Waxman Cases McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2015
PTO Refusal to Terminate Ongoing Proceeding Is Not Immediately Reviewable McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2015
Cable Networks Throw Copyright Infringement Haymaker at Online Streaming Sites Proskauer Rose LLP
May
30
2015
Need to Establish Criticality of Claimed Range to Avoid Anticipation by Broader, Overlapping Range McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2015
Cannot Deny Defendant’s Attorneys’ Fees Motion After Finding Case Exceptional Without Basis McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2015
Apple v. Samsung: Design Patents Reap Profits Foley & Lardner LLP
May
30
2015
Counterfeiting – Bad Business for E-Commerce Websites Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
30
2015
Motivation to Combine Reviewable for Clear Error - Insite Vision Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2015
Changes in Russian Trademark Law Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
29
2015
Claim Construction OK; but Still No Summary Judgment Where Material Facts Remain in Dispute McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Implementation of Teva’s Hybrid Review Claim Construction McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
No Substantial Change in Standard for Indefiniteness Under “Reasonable Certainty” Test McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Allvoice Decision Provides Roadmap For Software-based Inventions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
29
2015
Info-Hold Cases: De Novo Review Where Claim Construction Evidence Is Neither Intrinsic Nor Extrinsic and Expert Damages Testimony Unnecessary for Damages McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
No Competitive Injury Without Intent and Action to Enter the Market re: False Marking Statute McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Quantify Versus Quality Determines Domestic Industry: Lelo Inc. v. International Trade Commission McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Biodelivery Sciences International v. Monosol RX: Denying Institution Because of Insufficient Explanation of Why POSITA Would Have Found the Invention Obvious IPR2015-00167 Faegre Drinker
May
29
2015
Divided Commission Upholds ALJ’s Default Sanction and Attorney Fee Award Against Respondent and its Law Firm McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
An Abstract Idea by Any Other Name - Epicor Software Corp. v. Protegrity Corp., Google Inc. v. Unwired Planet, LLC McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
ID on Infringement and Public Interest in Remand of InterDigital Investigation McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
A Sucking Sound on Domain Names: .SUCKS is Open for Registration Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
29
2015
Federal Circuit Vacates Panel Decision on Disparaging Trademark and Orders En Banc Hearing McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins