Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Organization
May
22
2015
Reflectix, Inc. v. Promethean Insulation Technology LLC Denying Institution IPR2015-00039, 42, 44, 45, 47 Faegre Drinker
May
22
2015
Apple Inc. v. E-Watch, Inc., Decision Denying Institution IPR2015-00413 Faegre Drinker
May
22
2015
FDA releases additional draft guidance regarding implementation of BPCIA Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
22
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 22, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
21
2015
Oxford Nanopore Technologies v. University of Washington and UAB Research Foundation: Granting Joinder and Instituting Review of Second Petition by Same Party IPR2015-00057 Faegre Drinker
May
21
2015
Apotex Petitions Supreme Court to Review Therasense Standards Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
21
2015
Is It Time to Switch Gears? Enforceability of Automotive Company Employee Confidentiality Restrictions Foley & Lardner LLP
May
21
2015
Design Patent Case Digest: Kreative Power v. Monoprice Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
21
2015
LG Electronics Toshiba VIZIO and Hulu v. Straight Path IP Group: Decision on Institution IPR2015-00196 Faegre Drinker
May
21
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 21, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
21
2015
Patent Safe Harbor Applies To Supplemental New Drug Applications Foley & Lardner LLP
May
21
2015
Actifio v. Delphix Corp: Granting Institution IPR2015-00100 Faegre Drinker
May
20
2015
Ninth Circuit Rules Against Takedown of Anti-Islam Video on Copyright Grounds Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
20
2015
Apple-Samsung Trade Dress Case Demonstrates Potential Value of Design Patents Katten
May
20
2015
World Bottling Cap, LLC v. Crown Packaging Technology, Inc.: Denying Institution for Not Adequately Explaining Correspondence of Prior Art to Claims IPR2015-00296 Faegre Drinker
May
20
2015
J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing CBM2014-00157 Faegre Drinker
May
20
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 20, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
20
2015
Oxford Nanopore Tech. Ltd. v. Univ. of Washington and UAB Research Foundation: Granting Motion for Joinder IPR2015-00057 Faegre Drinker
May
20
2015
IBM Corp v. Intellectual Ventures: Granting Motion to File Supplemental Evidence and Request to Cross-Examine IPR2014-01385 Faegre Drinker
May
19
2015
“Restriction Requirements” Series, Part 1: Considering Restrictions When Developing A Claim Filing Strategy Mintz
May
19
2015
Medtronic v. NuVasive: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00073 Faegre Drinker
May
19
2015
The Importance of Contracts for Joint Infringement in Patent Cases Foley & Lardner LLP
May
19
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 19, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
19
2015
Marvell Semiconductor v. Intellectual Ventures: Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00553 Faegre Drinker
May
19
2015
Square v. J. Carl Cooper: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00157 Faegre Drinker
May
19
2015
Actor Did Not Have Copyright Interest in Mohammed Film, Ninth Circuit Rules Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
19
2015
Don't Name Your Furniture Store After A Grocery Store Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
19
2015
What Factors Do Courts Consider in Trademark Disputes? McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
May
19
2015
Federal Circuit Finds No Direct Infringement Of Akamai Patents Foley & Lardner LLP
May
19
2015
Microsoft Google v. B.E. Technology: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00039 Faegre Drinker
May
18
2015
Additional Discovery In Inter Partes Reviews—Absolutely No Fishing Allowed Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
18
2015
There’s No Such Thing As a Free Sample Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
18
2015
ABS Global v. Inguran:Denying Institution Where Prior Art Provided Only a Possibility of a Claimed Feature IPR2015-00001 Faegre Drinker
May
18
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 18, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
18
2015
John’s Lone Star Distribution v. Thermolife International: Additional Discovery Granted to Determine Real Party-In-Interest IPR2014-01201 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins