Oct 10 2014 |
Allegations that Defendants Provided Product for “Free” State Claims Under California’s Unfair Practices Act (UPA) and Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Notwithstanding that “Cost” of Product Was Recouped by Overcharging for Shipping |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 24 2014 |
Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software, Inc.: Guidance on Stays Pending Post-Issuance Proceedings |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 16 2010 |
ITAR License Exemption Amended To Allow Hand-Carrying Of Technical Data Outside The United States |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 11 2011 |
Protecting Trade Secrets In A Post-WikiLeaks World |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 18 2015 |
There’s No Such Thing As a Free Sample |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 3 2022 |
SEC Targets NFTs |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 4 2022 |
Mythical Games Scores NFL License for Blockchain Video Game |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 26 2017 |
Cesari S.R.L. v. Peju Province Winery L.P.: Relying on Supreme Court Precedent, District Court Holds that Trademark Trial & Appeal Board Finding of Likelihood of Confusion has Preclusive Effect |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 19 2023 |
Potential Sanctions for Alleged Intellectual Property Theft on the Horizon? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 8 2023 |
Takeaways from the Hermès Litigation over MetaBirkins NFTs |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 7 2023 |
Divided Federal Circuit Makes Controversial Ruling That Nonliteral Elements of “Cloned” Software Are Not Protectable Because It Was Based on Open Source and Other Known Material |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 13 2023 |
Celebrity “Faces Off” Against Deep Fake AI App Over Right of Publicity |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 27 2013 |
Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) Goes Down - Copyright Goes Up - U.S. v. Windsor, Supreme Court, No. 12-307, Decided June 26, 2013 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 25 2023 |
PTAB Makes Significant Changes to Director Review Process |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 7 2013 |
Beijing Higher People's Court Clarifies Usage of Consent Letters to Overcome Trademark Rejections in the People's Republic of China (PRC) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 22 2019 |
Returning to the Status Quo? – Proposed Outline for Section 101 Reform |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Nov 17 2023 |
USPTO Guidance on Design Patents Including a Computer-Generated Electronic Image |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 14 2023 |
PTAB’s Decision of a Singular-Only Construction of the Term “The Sample Stream” Reversed |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 31 2013 |
A Short-Lived Victory for Generic Manufacturers? – Part 2 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 25 2016 |
Federal Circuit Finds Software-Related Claims Patent Eligible in Enfish v. Microsoft Corp. |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 14 2016 |
Proposed New FDA Labeling Rules Would Result in Increased Generic Drug Product Liability Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 27 2017 |
Who’s Got the Spirit?! Supreme Court Decides Star Athletic v. Varsity Brands; New Two-Part Test Seeks to Clear Up “Mess” But Questions Still Remain About Subjective Nature of Separability Analysis |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 21 2020 |
Ninth Circuit Applies the “Continued Use” Doctrine to the Defend Trade Secrets Act Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 18 2021 |
Special Considerations in Video Game M&A Transactions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 16 2014 |
Sandoz and Celltrion Decline the Invitation to Dance: Biosimilars Challenge the Applicability of the BPCIA’s Exchange Provisions Before Bringing Suit |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 31 2011 |
Expanded Standing, or "Back to Basics"? Flash Memory Direct Purchasers Found to Have Standing to Assert Walker Process Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 23 2022 |
Provisions on Administration of Algorithmic Recommendation Took Effect on March 1 |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 30 2018 |
Contractors Beware: The 2018 NDAA Ushers In New Changes Affecting IP Rights |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 11 2022 |
Key Rules and Cases for Patent Practitioners Working on AI Patent Applications |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 17 2013 |
In a Rarely-Seen Joint-Effort in the Competition Arena, the DOJ and the USPTO Unite in Issuing a Policy Statement on Remedies Involving Standard Essential Patents |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 25 2013 |
Thin Copyrights - Protected But Not Infringed |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 31 2023 |
UCB, Inc. v. Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. No. 2021-1924, (Fed. Cir. Apr. 12, 2023) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 4 2023 |
FS.COM INC. v. International Trade Commission Corning Optical Communications LLC – Intervenor No. 22-1228 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2023) |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 15 2013 |
The Architecture of Copyright |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 21 2019 |
Federal Circuit Weighs in on Patent Subject-Matter Eligibility of Dietary Supplements |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |