Litigation

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

The National Law Review is a no-log-in resource of legal articles addressing litigation, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution. We provide legal news on the most recent litigated business and commercial cases including antitrust, banking and financial institutions, construction, complex disputes/class actions involving multi-parties and multi-jurisdictions, communications, employment law, environmental actions, government enforcement defense, insurance, intellectual property, mergers and business combinations, products liability, professional liability, real estate and development, environmental, securities enforcement, white-collar criminal actions, and trust and estate litigation. Details of actions by federal and state and local regulatory agencies as well as private actions from across the U.S. are added daily.

The legal experts who write for the National Law Review cover the federal circuit courts as well as the Supreme Court, analyzing the decisions and opinions from the justices at these levels and parsing the meaning and greater context of these decisions.  For coverage of the circuit courts and the decisions at the Supreme Court, the National Law Review has breaking news coverage of these issues. Additionally, coverage of litigation as a process, including rules of evidence, jury selection, and information on expert witnesses is available on the site.

Along with traditional litigation, the National Law Review also covers alternate dispute resolution (ADR), as well as the viability of Arbitration Agreements in a variety of contexts. The benefits of mediation as opposed to litigation, and the benefits of arbitration.  Compulsory arbitration clauses in agreements relating to major corporations, shareholder agreements, or multinational agreements, are covered on the National Law Review.

Additionally, the National Law Review covers trends in -e-discovery and regulations in document analysis and trial preparation. 

We also serve as a resource for the latest developments in civil proceduree-discovery, trial practice, appellate practice, and alternative dispute resolution, including mediation and arbitration involving both binding adversarial proceedings and non-binding voluntary procedures before neutral third parties.

National Law Review Litigation & Class Action Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Litigation, Class Action Law Suits, Appellate Rulings, TCPA, and more, be sure to follow our Litigation Law X (formerly Twitter) feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Litigation, Trial, ADR, E-Discovery & Court News

Title
Custom text Organization
Aug
16
2014
TRW Automotive US LLC v. Magna Electronics, Inc., Granting in part and Denying in part Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00266 Faegre Drinker
Dec
16
2014
USPTO Issues New Subject Matter Eligibility Examination Interim Guidelines – Nature-Based Product Guidance Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
12
2015
Scott Ford Discusses the Importance of Understanding a Client’s Business Objective when Determining the Appropriate Strategy to Resolve a Dispute. Mintz
Apr
18
2017
Federal Courts Reject Challenges to Underwriting and Claims Practices In Connection With Death Benefit Denials Faegre Drinker
Dec
13
2018
Supreme Court to Reconsider “Auer Deference” Rule and Possibly Shrink Agency Leeway In Interpreting Regulations: Cracks in the Façade Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
19
2019
Supreme Court Class Action Litigation Summary, Fall 2019 Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jul
31
2020
Department of Commerce Publishes FAQs Regarding Impact of Schrems II Decision Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jun
1
2021
Supreme Court Update: United States v. Palomar-Santiago (No. 20-437), Guam v. United States (No. 20-382), San Antonio v. Hotels.com (No. 20-334) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jan
14
2022
Patent Owner Tips for Surviving an Instituted IPR: From Depositions to Sur-Replies [VIDEO] Mintz
Apr
24
2014
Employer Must Bargain with Union over Requirement to Sign Interview Notes, National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Rules Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jun
20
2014
Supreme Court Rules Patent Claims Ineligible as Abstract Ideas, Affirming Federal Circuit in Alice Corp Pty. Ltd. V. CLS Bank Int'l Katten
Oct
14
2014
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) Decision Permits Solicitation of Nominating Signatures at Supermarket Entrance Sherin and Lodgen LLP
Feb
27
2015
Massachusetts Permit Session Jurisdiction Explained Sherin and Lodgen LLP
Sep
1
2015
Ninth Circuit Establishes Standard for EPA Policy Reversals ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jan
12
2016
Indoor Skydiving Germany GMBH v. iFLY Holdings: Denying Request for Rehearing Regarding Public Availability of Prior Art IPR2015-01272 Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2017
Plaintiffs Lack Standing to Bring ERISA Fee Litigation Case Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
29
2018
NRDC Moves to Dismiss Petition for Review of New Chemicals Decision-Making Framework Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
Aug
30
2019
California Supreme Court Reinforces CEQA’s Definition of a Project Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Jun
8
2020
Motion to Dismiss Denied: Plaintiff’s Prerecorded Message Allegations Adequately Assert ATDS Violation Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
5
2021
Watch Your Language: The Perils of Patent Profanity: Consideration of both the U.S. and Europe Finnegan
Jul
2
2015
Texas Supreme Court Rules that CERCLA PRP Letters and Enforcement Proceedings Are “Suits” Subject to the Duty to Defend Under Standard CGL Insurance Policies Beveridge & Diamond PC
Oct
28
2015
Land Use – Transportation Impact Fees Stark & Stark
Jun
6
2016
No Pregnant Pauses Here: Workplace Laws Protecting Expectant Mothers Becoming the Norm across the United States Vedder Price
Nov
28
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 28, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
25
2017
Par Pharmaceutical Beats FCA Prescription-Switch Allegations McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
10
2022
UK Supreme Court Confirms Creditor Duty in Zone of Insolvency: BTI v Sequana Katten
Apr
26
2023
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Holds Invasion of Privacy and Wiretapping Claims Against E-Commerce Company Not Subject to Binding Arbitration Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
12
2013
Teaching Hospitals May Adjust Number of Residents and Interns for Medicare Payment Past Three-Year Review Period, D.C. Appeals Court Rules Barnes & Thornburg LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins