8th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit sits in St. Louis Missouri. The Courthouse is the Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse. In addition to the Court of Appeals, the Eighth Circuit spans over 6-US states, including: Missouri, Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and South Dakota. Although the Eighth Circuit originally had additional states situated in the geographic-region, Congress passed legislation which broke the Circuit into 2-separate circuits, which is known as the Tenth Circuit today.

The courthouses in each state are further broken down into regions. The Eastern District court in Arkansas sits in Little Rock and Western District court is in Fort Smith. The Northern District court in Iowa is in Cedar Rapids, and Southern District is in Des Moines, IA. The District of Minnesota court sits in Minneapolis, the Eastern District court is in St. Louis (Appeals court), and Western District is in Kansas City, MO. The District of Nebraska court sits in Omaha. The Northern District court in South Dakota is in Fargo, and Southern District court is in Sioux Falls, SD.

Currently there are 11 active judges on the bench in the Eighth Circuit and 7 senior judges. The Chief Justice is Lavenski Smith, and the Circuit Justice is Neil Gorsuch. A number of precedent-setting decisions have come from the Eighth District. Frosty Treats Inc. v Sony Computer Entertainment of America, Inc. (2005) is one of those cases. In the trademark case, the court held that Frosty Treats (largest US ice cream company) was not “distinctive” or “famous enough” to receive immunity protections from being used in a violent video game.

The National Law Review covers cases such as Frosty v Sony which deal with trademarks and branding, as well as several other categories and case law. Bankruptcy proceedings, tax related cases, government actions, indemnity cases, state actions, appointments, and State and Federal agency news. The National Law Review also covers the latest news pertaining to legislation, patents, election, and general-information in the legal community.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Aug
17
2016
Hospital’s Reasonable Interpretation of Ambiguous Law Supports Dismissal of Relator’s Case McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
20
2022
How Not to Waive Your Right to Arbitrate Much Shelist, P.C.
Feb
14
2020
How Public Events Can Shape Private Title IX Proceedings Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jun
3
2015
How Serious is “Serious” under the FMLA? McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
Jul
7
2013
Impact of Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) Rulings in Court Decisions Katten
Sep
28
2023
Impending Rite Aid Chapter 11 Bankruptcy – 4 Things Trade Creditors and Landlords Should Know Stark & Stark
Jan
10
2019
Implications of the Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Prohibition For Consumer Financial Services Providers [PODCAST] Ballard Spahr LLP
Sep
15
2022
Implied Copyright License to Photographs of Artist Formerly Known as Prince McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
19
2018
In SEC v. Cohen, Court Continues Trend of Limiting SEC Enforcement Powers Covington & Burling LLP
Jun
28
2016
In Wake of Escobar, False Claims Act Cases Return to Circuit Courts Mintz
Dec
9
2013
Inability to Perform Essential Job Functions after FMLA (Family Medical Leave Act) Leave Sinks LPN’s Disability Discrimination, FMLA Claims Jackson Lewis P.C.
May
12
2014
Indian Nations Law Focus: Selected Court Decisions Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
Aug
28
2019
Indian Nations Law Update - August 2019 Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
Feb
27
2021
Indian Nations Law Update - February 2021 Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
Jan
29
2021
Indian Nations Law Update - January 2021 Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
Mar
17
2020
Indian Nations Law Update - March 2020 Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
Mar
17
2021
Indian Nations Law Update - March 2021 Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
May
21
2020
Indian Nations Law Update - May 2020 Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
May
12
2021
Indian Nations Law Update - May 2021 Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
Nov
24
2020
Indian Nations Law Update - November 2020 Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
Oct
24
2019
Indian Nations Law Update - October 2019 Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
Aug
24
2016
Industrial Espionage and the Defend Trade Secrets Act Mintz
May
20
2021
Initial Confusion? Relax, Eighth Circuit Has Your Number McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
27
2019
Injunction to Stop Enforcement of Meat Labeling Law Not Needed, Says AR Keller and Heckman LLP
May
3
2019
Insurance Policy Language Used to Challenge Consent Judgments with Covenants Not to Execute Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Jul
21
2014
Insurer’s Poorly Drafted Language Applied As Written; Insured Can’t Complain When New York Law is Applied After It Chose to Reject Missouri Tax Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jul
31
2014
Interfere at Your Own Risk: Legal Fees Awarded as Damages for Violating A Non-Compete Agreement Mintz
Jul
31
2013
Internet Evidence - Part III: Hearsay Exceptions Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.
Sep
18
2021
Iowa Supreme Court Examines Private Sector Drug-Free Workplaces Statute Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Nov
22
2021
IRS Announces Nonacquiescence in Mayo Tax Regulation Invalidity Holding McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
12
2013
IRS Denied Peek Behind the Curtain: District Court Protects Wells Fargo’s Tax Accrual Workpapers McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
4
2020
Is Shoddy Work an Occurrence Under CGL Policies? Not in Missouri Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
23
2014
Is There a Statute of Limitation in Government Clean Water Act Cases? Armstrong Teasdale
May
30
2017
It’s a Federal Question: Can Defendants Remove Under the Grable Doctrine? ArentFox Schiff LLP
Dec
28
2018
It’s Flu Season Again . . . Are Your Mandatory Vaccination Policies Immune to Legal Challenges? Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins